Literature DB >> 12083929

The tightness contribution to the Brønsted alpha for hydride transfer between NAD+ analogues.

In-Sook Han Lee1, Kim-Hung Chow, Maurice M Kreevoy.   

Abstract

It has been shown that the rate of symmetrical hydride transfer reaction varies with the hydride affinity of the (identical) donor and acceptor. In that case, Marcus theory of atom and group transfer predicts that the Brønsted alpha depends on the location of the substituent, whether it is in the donor or the acceptor, and the tightness of the critical configuration, as well as the resemblance of the critical configuration to reactants or products. This prediction has now been confirmed for hydride transfer reactions between heterocyclic, nitrogen-containing cations, which can be regarded as analogues of the enzyme cofactor, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+). A series of reactions with substituents in the donor gives Brønsted alpha of 0.67 +/- 0.03 and a tightness parameter, tau, of 0.64 +/- 0.06. With substituents in the acceptor alpha = 0.32 +/- 0.03 and tau = 0.68 +/- 0.08. The reactions are all spontaneous, with equilibrium constants between 0.4 and 3 x 10(4), and the two sets span about the same range of equilibrium constants. The two tau values are essentially identical with an average value of 0.66 +/- 0.05. These results can be semiquantitatively mimicked by rate constants calculated for a linear, triatomic model of the reaction. Variational transition state theory and a physically motivated but empirically calibrated potential function were used. The computed rate constants generate an alpha value of 0.56 if the hydride affinity of the acceptor is varied and an alpha of 0.44 if the hydride affinity of the donor is varied. The calculated kinetic isotope effects are similar to the measured values. A previous error in the Born charging term of the potential function has been corrected. Marcus theory can be successfully fitted to both the experimental and computed rate constants, and appears to be the most compact way to express and compare them. The success of the linear triatomic model in qualitatively reproducing these results encourages the continued use of this easily conceptualized model to think about group, ion, and atom transfer reactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12083929     DOI: 10.1021/ja011855u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  6 in total

1.  Nonperfect synchronization of reaction center rehybridization in the transition state of the hydride transfer catalyzed by dihydrofolate reductase.

Authors:  Jingzhi Pu; Shuhua Ma; Mireia Garcia-Viloca; Jiali Gao; Donald G Truhlar; Amnon Kohen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Kinetic effects of increased proton transfer distance on proton-coupled oxidations of phenol-amines.

Authors:  Todd F Markle; Ian J Rhile; James M Mayer
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 3.  Biochemistry and theory of proton-coupled electron transfer.

Authors:  Agostino Migliore; Nicholas F Polizzi; Michael J Therien; David N Beratan
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Outer-Sphere 2 e- /2 H+ Transfer Reactions of Ruthenium(II)-Amine and Ruthenium(IV)-Amido Complexes.

Authors:  Mauricio Cattaneo; Scott A Ryken; James M Mayer
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Effect of basic site substituents on concerted proton-electron transfer in hydrogen-bonded pyridyl-phenols.

Authors:  Todd F Markle; Tristan A Tronic; Antonio G DiPasquale; Werner Kaminsky; James M Mayer
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 2.781

6.  Biomimetic hydrogenation of electron deficient olefins using in situ generated 2-arylbenzimidazoline: synthesis of novel 3-benzylbenzo[4,5]thiazolo[3,2-a]pyrimidin-4-ones.

Authors:  Maryam Danehchin; Abbas Ali Esmaeili
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 2.943

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.