Literature DB >> 12083028

Results of stapling and conventional hemorrhoidectomy.

B S Ooi, Y H Ho, C L Tang, K W Eu, F Seow-Choen.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2002        PMID： 12083028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN： 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Dynamic imaging of pelvic floor with transperineal sonography.

Authors:  J J O'Connor
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Long-term outcomes after circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  E Aytac; E Gorgun; H H Erem; M A Abbas; T L Hull; F H Remzi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: is still the gold standard treatment?

Authors:  Marco Milone; Paola Maietta; Maddalena Leongito; Giuseppe Pesce; Giuseppe Salvatore; Francesco Milone
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2012-04-10

4.  Prospective randomized trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  K S Ho; Y H Ho
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Short-term results of DST EEA 33 stapler and neu@ anoscope for stapled haemorrhoidectomy: a prospective study of 1,118 patients from a single centre.

Authors:  Ming Hian Kam; Jit Fong Lim; Kok Sun Ho; Boon Swee Ooi; Kong Weng Eu
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 6.  A systematic review of the literature assessing the outcomes of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus open haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Q Z Ruan; W English; A Hotouras; C Bryant; F Taylor; S Andreani; S D Wexner; S Banerjee
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.781
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.