Literature DB >> 12083004

Natural substrates of the proteasome and their recognition by the ubiquitin system.

H D Ulrich1.   

Abstract

The multitude of natural substrates of the 26S proteasome demonstrates convincingly the diversity and flexibility of the ubiquitin/proteasome system: at the same time, the number of pathways in which ubiquitin-dependent degradation is involved highlights the importance of regulated proteolysis for cellular metabolism. This review has addressed recent advances in our understanding of the principles that govern the recognition and targeting of potential substrates. While the mechanism of ubiquitin activation and conjugation is largely understood, the determination of substrate specificity by ubiquitin protein ligases remains a field of active research. Several conserved degradation signals within substrate proteins have been identified, and it is becoming increasingly clear that these serve as docking sites for specific sets of E3s, which in turn adhere to a number of well-defined strategies for the recognition of these motifs. In particular, RING finger proteins are now emerging as a new and apparently widespread class of ubiquitin ligases. The discovery of more and more E3s will undoubtedly reveal even better the common principles in architecture and mechanisms of this class of enzymes. In contrast to substrate recognition by the ubiquitin conjugation system, the way in which a ubiquitylated protein is delivered to the 26S proteasome is poorly understood. There is no doubt that multiubiquitin chains serve as the principal determinant for recognition by the proteasome, and a number of receptors and candidate targeting factors are known, some of which are associated with the proteasome itself; however, unresolved issues are the significance of the different geometries that alternatively linked multiubiquitin chains can adopt, the role of transport between subcellular compartments, as well as the participation of chaperones in the delivery step. Finally, the analysis of ubiquitin-independent, substrate-specific targeting mechanisms, such as the AZ-dependent degradation of ODC, may provide unexpected answers to questions about protein recognition by the 26S proteasome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12083004     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-59414-4_6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol        ISSN: 0070-217X            Impact factor:   4.291


  9 in total

1.  Phosphorylation of a novel SOCS-box regulates assembly of the HIV-1 Vif-Cul5 complex that promotes APOBEC3G degradation.

Authors:  Andrew Mehle; Joao Goncalves; Mariana Santa-Marta; Mark McPike; Dana Gabuzda
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Nuclear export is evolutionarily conserved in CVC paired-like homeobox proteins and influences protein stability, transcriptional activation, and extracellular secretion.

Authors:  Shirley K Knauer; Gert Carra; Roland H Stauber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Identification and characterization of a Drosophila proteasome regulatory network.

Authors:  Josefin Lundgren; Patrick Masson; Zahra Mirzaei; Patrick Young
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Existence of transdominant and potentiating mutants of UL9, the herpes simplex virus type 1 origin-binding protein, suggests that levels of UL9 protein may be regulated during infection.

Authors:  Boriana Marintcheva; Sandra K Weller
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Cellular source of the poxviral N1R/p28 gene family.

Authors:  Robert D Nicholls; Todd A Gray
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.198

Review 6.  Cullin 3 as a novel target in diverse pathologies.

Authors:  Ana Cristina Andérica-Romero; Irma Gabriela González-Herrera; Abel Santamaría; José Pedraza-Chaverri
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 11.799

7.  The heat shock protein 90 of Plasmodium falciparum and antimalarial activity of its inhibitor, geldanamycin.

Authors:  Rajinder Kumar; Alla Musiyenko; Sailen Barik
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 2.979

8.  Commentary on CAM and NK Cells by Kazuyoshi Takeda and Ko Okumura.

Authors:  Edwin L. Cooper
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  MKRN2 inhibits migration and invasion of non-small-cell lung cancer by negatively regulating the PI3K/Akt pathway.

Authors:  Jun Jiang; Yitong Xu; Hongjiu Ren; Muli Wudu; Qiongzi Wang; Xin Song; Hongbo Su; Xizi Jiang; Lihong Jiang; Xueshan Qiu
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-08-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.