Literature DB >> 12082477

Glyburide compared to insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus: a cost analysis.

Laura Goetzl1, Isabelle Wilkins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs associated with glyburide compared to insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes unresponsive to dietary therapy. STUDY
DESIGN: A cost model was designed. The model excluded costs that were identical for both treatment arms, such as the cost of monitoring glucose control. Insulin treatment costs included average wholesale drug costs, wholesale delivery costs (syringes, alcohol pads), and costs of office staff educating patients. Glyburide costs were based on average wholesale drug costs. Downstream costs of potential inpatient evaluation for hypoglycemia were included in the model.
RESULTS: In our baseline model, glyburide was significantly less costly than insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes. The average cost saving per patient based on wholesale drug costs and hospital costs was US$165.84. Actual retail drug savings and hospital charge savings are potentially considerably greater. The strongest determinant of cost savings was medication cost. The model was less sensitive to the one-time costs of inpatient treatment and patient education.
CONCLUSION: Glyburide is less costly than insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes. Cost models can be useful to physicians deciding between two equally efficacious medications, allowing them to incorporate information about their individual practice styles with a complex balance of cost implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12082477     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  10 in total

Review 1.  Oral Agents for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes.

Authors:  Matthew M Finneran; Mark B Landon
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  Using oral agents to manage gestational diabetes: what have we learned?

Authors:  Elizabeth Buschur; Florence Brown; Jennifer Wyckoff
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 3.  Pharmacological Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Geetha Mukerji; Denice S Feig
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Pharmacological Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Riki Bergel; Eran Hadar; Yoel Toledano; Moshe Hod
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 5.  The role of sulphonylureas in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Marc Rendell
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Gestational diabetes mellitus: Non-insulin management.

Authors:  Navneet Magon; V Seshiah
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-10

7.  Development and validation of prediction models for gestational diabetes treatment modality using supervised machine learning: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lauren D Liao; Assiamira Ferrara; Mara B Greenberg; Amanda L Ngo; Juanran Feng; Zhenhua Zhang; Patrick T Bradshaw; Alan E Hubbard; Yeyi Zhu
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 11.150

8.  A Real-World Anti-Diabetes Medication Cost Comparison Between Premixed Insulin Analogs and Long-Acting Insulin Analogs in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Database Analysis.

Authors:  Yue Gao; Ke Wang; Yun Chen; Li Shen; Jianing Hou; Jianwei Xuan; Bao Liu
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.945

9.  Neonatal, infant, and childhood growth following metformin versus insulin treatment for gestational diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jane L Tarry-Adkins; Catherine E Aiken; Susan E Ozanne
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Diabetes and pregnancy: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Ian Blumer; Eran Hadar; David R Hadden; Lois Jovanovič; Jorge H Mestman; M Hassan Murad; Yariv Yogev
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.958

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.