Literature DB >> 12082473

Impact of family health insurance and other environmental factors on universal hearing screen program effectiveness.

Betty R Vohr1, Patricia E Moore, Richard J Tucker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to evaluate the relationship among health insurance type, other demographic factors, and newborn hearing screen compliance and outcomes. STUDY
DESIGN: The cohort consisted of 39,153 infants screened in Rhode Island between July 1, 1995 and June 30, 1998. Multivariate analyses were completed to evaluate relationships between health insurance type and completion of the in-hospital hearing screen and the rescreen, if indicated.
RESULTS: Successful newborn screen rates ranged from 98.1% to 99.8%. Infants with traditional Medicaid insurance were more likely to not be screened (p<0.0001) and to not return for a rescreen (p<0.0001). Infants in families with managed care Medicaid had screen compliance similar to infants with commercial health insurance. Multivariate analyses revealed that Medicaid insurance, no insurance, neonatal intensive care unit status, and out-of-state address predicted no initial screen (p<0.001) and no rescreen (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: In population-based health services, it is important that the effects of socioeconomic and demographic variables on outcomes be evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12082473     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  7 in total

Review 1.  Universal neonatal hearing screening moving from evidence to practice.

Authors:  C Kennedy; D McCann
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Impact of co-occurring birth defects on the timing of newborn hearing screening and diagnosis.

Authors:  Derek A Chapman; Caroline C Stampfel; Joann N Bodurtha; Kelley M Dodson; Arti Pandya; Kathleen B Lynch; Russell S Kirby
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.493

3.  Evolution of an integrated public health surveillance system.

Authors:  Derek A Chapman; Nancy Ford; Susan Tlusty; Joann N Bodurtha
Journal:  J Registry Manag       Date:  2011

4.  Pediatric Cochlear Implantation: Why Do Children Receive Implants Late?

Authors:  Elizabeth M Fitzpatrick; Julia Ham; JoAnne Whittingham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Protocol and programme factors associated with referral and loss to follow-up from newborn hearing screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Allison R Mackey; Andrea M L Bussé; Valeria Del Vecchio; Elina Mäki-Torkko; Inger M Uhlén
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.567

6.  Performance and characteristics of the Newborn Hearing Screening Program in Campania region (Italy) between 2013 and 2019.

Authors:  Rita Malesci; Valeria Del Vecchio; Dario Bruzzese; Ernesto Burattini; Gennaro Auletta; Monica Errichiello; Anna Rita Fetoni; Annamaria Franzè; Carla Laria; Fabiana Toscano; Antonio Caso; Elio Marciano
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Multiprofessional committee on auditory health: COMUSA.

Authors:  Doris Ruthy Lewis; Silvio Antonio Monteiro Marone; Beatriz C A Mendes; Oswaldo Laercio Mendonça Cruz; Manoel de Nóbrega
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.