Literature DB >> 12082362

The relationship of race/ethnicity and social class to hormone replacement therapy: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988-1994.

Diana Friedman-Koss1, Carlos J Crespo, Michele F Bellantoni, Ross E Andersen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use a nationally representative sample to examine the prevalence of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use and its relationship to different markers of social class in American women 60 years of age and older.
DESIGN: Nationally representative cross-sectional survey with an in-person interview and medical examination. Between 1988 and 1994, 3,479 women aged 60 to 90+ years were examined as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. Mexican Americans, non-Hispanic blacks and much older women were oversampled to produce reliable estimates for these groups.
RESULTS: Overall, the number of women who reported ever having used HRT was 37% [confidence interval (CI), 33%-40%] of all women older than 60 years of age; 40% (CI, 37%-41%) of older, non-Hispanic white women; 20% (CI, 14%-25%) of non-Hispanic black women; and 24% (CI, 20%-29%) of Mexican American women. HRT was used by 43% (CI, 38%-47%) of women 60 to 70 years old, 37% (CI, 32%-41%) of those 71 to 80 years old, and 20% (CI, 13%-26%) of women older than 80. HRT use was lowest among women who did not complete high school or among those in the lowest family income categories. Among women more than 60 years old who reported having a hysterectomy, 51% (CI, 47%-55%) reported using HRT, whereas only 20% (CI, 17%-23%) of those who had a natural menopause reported using HRT.
CONCLUSIONS: Although many women can benefit from HRT, the number of American women who report they have ever used it remains low. More research is needed to examine the implications of racial differences in compliance, patient and physician attitudes toward HRT, and possible environmental barriers that may prevent use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12082362     DOI: 10.1097/00042192-200207000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Menopause        ISSN: 1072-3714            Impact factor:   2.953


  16 in total

1.  Temporal trends in the black/white breast cancer case ratio for estrogen receptor status: disparities are historically contingent, not innate.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger; Jarvis T Chen; Pamela D Waterman
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Breast Cancer and Socioeconomic Status in Austria.

Authors:  Ursula Kunze; Gabriela Böhm
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Premenopausal Hysterectomy and Risk of Ovarian Cancer in African-American Women.

Authors:  Lauren C Peres; Anthony J Alberg; Elisa V Bandera; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Melissa Bondy; Michele L Cote; Ellen Funkhouser; Patricia G Moorman; Edward S Peters; Ann G Schwartz; Paul D Terry; Sarah E Abbott; Fabian Camacho; Frances Wang; Joellen M Schildkraut
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Hip fracture risk among community-dwelling elderly people in the United States: a prospective study of physical, cognitive, and socioeconomic indicators.

Authors:  Robin Taylor Wilson; Gary A Chase; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Robert B Wallace
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Postmenopausal hormone therapy is not associated with risk of all-cause dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jacqueline O'Brien; John W Jackson; Francine Grodstein; Deborah Blacker; Jennifer Weuve
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Socioeconomic disparities in the decline in invasive breast cancer incidence.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  History, biology, and health inequities: emergent embodied phenotypes and the illustrative case of the breast cancer estrogen receptor.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  Who and what is a "population"? Historical debates, current controversies, and implications for understanding "population health" and rectifying health inequities.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.911

9.  A sustained decline in postmenopausal hormone use: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2010.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Kathleen A Cronin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Recent trends in breast cancer incidence in US white women by county-level urban/rural and poverty status.

Authors:  Amelia K Hausauer; Theresa H M Keegan; Ellen T Chang; Sally L Glaser; Holly Howe; Christina A Clarke
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.