Literature DB >> 12081949

Evidence from terminal recombination gradients that FtsK uses replichore polarity to control chromosome terminus positioning at division in Escherichia coli.

Jacqueline Corre1, Jean-Michel Louarn.   

Abstract

Chromosome dimers in Escherichia coli are resolved at the dif locus by two recombinases, XerC and XerD, and the septum-anchored FtsK protein. Chromosome dimer resolution (CDR) is subject to strong spatiotemporal control: it takes place at the time of cell division, and it requires the dif resolution site to be located at the junction between the two polarized chromosome arms or replichores. Failure of CDR results in trapping of DNA by the septum and RecABCD recombination (terminal recombination). We had proposed that dif sites of a dimer are first moved to the septum by mechanisms based on local polarity and that normally CDR then occurs as the septum closes. To determine whether FtsK plays a role in the mobilization process, as well as in the recombination reaction, we characterized terminal recombination in an ftsK mutant. The frequency of recombination at various points in the terminus region of the chromosome was measured and compared with the recombination frequency on a xerC mutant chromosome with respect to intensity, the region affected, and response to polarity distortion. The use of a prophage excision assay, which allows variation of the site of recombination and interference with local polarity, allowed us to find that cooperating FtsK-dependent and -independent processes localize dif at the septum and that DNA mobilization by FtsK is oriented by the polarity probably due to skewed sequence motifs of the mobilized material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12081949      PMCID: PMC135174          DOI: 10.1128/JB.184.14.3801-3807.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  37 in total

1.  DNA degradation in the terminus region of resolvase mutants of Escherichia coli, and suppression of this degradation and the Dif phenotype by recD.

Authors:  J Prikryl; E C Hendricks; P L Kuempel
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.079

2.  Functional polarization of the Escherichia coli chromosome terminus: the dif site acts in chromosome dimer resolution only when located between long stretches of opposite polarity.

Authors:  K Pérals; F Cornet; Y Merlet; I Delon; J M Louarn
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Cell division, guillotining of dimer chromosomes and SOS induction in resolution mutants (dif, xerC and xerD) of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  E C Hendricks; H Szerlong; T Hill; P Kuempel
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  Prophage lambda induces terminal recombination in Escherichia coli by inhibiting chromosome dimer resolution. An orientation-dependent cis-effect lending support to bipolarization of the terminus.

Authors:  J Corre; J Patte; J M Louarn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  FtsK functions in the processing of a Holliday junction intermediate during bacterial chromosome segregation.

Authors:  F X Barre; M Aroyo; S D Colloms; A Helfrich; F Cornet; D J Sherratt
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 6.  DNA transport in bacteria.

Authors:  J Errington; J Bath; L J Wu
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 7.  DNA segregation in bacteria.

Authors:  G S Gordon; A Wright
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 15.500

Review 8.  Polarization of the Escherichia coli chromosome. A view from the terminus.

Authors:  H Capiaux; F Cornet; J Corre; M I Guijo; K Pérals; J E Rebollo; J M Louarn
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.079

9.  Detection and possible role of two large nondivisible zones on the Escherichia coli chromosome.

Authors:  J E Rebollo; V François; J M Louarn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  FtsQ, FtsL and FtsI require FtsK, but not FtsN, for co-localization with FtsZ during Escherichia coli cell division.

Authors:  J C Chen; J Beckwith
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.501

View more
  26 in total

1.  The membrane domain of SpoIIIE is required for membrane fusion during Bacillus subtilis sporulation.

Authors:  Marc D Sharp; Kit Pogliano
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  MinCD-dependent regulation of the polarity of SpoIIIE assembly and DNA transfer.

Authors:  Marc D Sharp; Kit Pogliano
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  Chromosome segregation in Eubacteria.

Authors:  Kit Pogliano; Joe Pogliano; Eric Becker
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.934

4.  New views of the bacterial chromosome.

Authors:  Susan T Lovett; Anca M Segall
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Asymmetric activation of Xer site-specific recombination by FtsK.

Authors:  Thomas H Massey; Laurent Aussel; François-Xavier Barre; David J Sherratt
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Isolation of SOS constitutive mutants of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Erin K O'Reilly; Kenneth N Kreuzer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Roles for replichores and macrodomains in segregation of the Escherichia coli chromosome.

Authors:  Christian Lesterlin; Romain Mercier; Frédéric Boccard; François-Xavier Barre; François Cornet
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  Selection for chromosome architecture in bacteria.

Authors:  Heather Hendrickson; Jeffrey G Lawrence
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Genome of bacteriophage P1.

Authors:  Małgorzata B Łobocka; Debra J Rose; Guy Plunkett; Marek Rusin; Arkadiusz Samojedny; Hansjörg Lehnherr; Michael B Yarmolinsky; Frederick R Blattner
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 10.  Mechanism and physiological significance of programmed replication termination.

Authors:  Deepak Bastia; Shamsu Zaman
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 7.727

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.