S Fumino1, K Tokiwa, T Katoh, S Ono, N Iwai. 1. Division of Surgery, Children's Research Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-0841, Japan. fumin@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In an anomalous arrangement of the pancreaticobiliary duct (AAPBD), two-way regurgitation, including pancreaticobiliary reflux and biliopancreatic reflux (BPR), might occur. Although pancreaticobiliary reflux has been shown by high levels of pancreatic enzymes in bile, there have been few reports of clinical evidence of BPR in AAPBD. Recently, spiral computed tomography combined with intravenous infusion cholangiography (IVC-SCT) has been reported to be useful for visualizing the biliary anatomy, which may allow a new insight into bile flow dynamics in AAPBD. METHODS: Fifteen paediatric patients with AAPBD were examined before operation using both IVC-SCT and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Visualization of the main pancreatic duct on IVC-SCT defined the presence of BPR. Blood samples were also analysed when the initial symptom was strongly present. RESULTS: BPR was observed in six of 15 patients. Pancreatic enlargement and hyperamylasaemia were significantly more frequent in patients without BPR than in those with BPR. Levels of enzyme markers of cholestasis were also higher in the former group. CONCLUSION: The present study, using IVC-SCT, has identified clinical evidence of BPR in AAPBD. Further studies are necessary to determine the correlation between BPR and clinical manifestations.
BACKGROUND: In an anomalous arrangement of the pancreaticobiliary duct (AAPBD), two-way regurgitation, including pancreaticobiliary reflux and biliopancreatic reflux (BPR), might occur. Although pancreaticobiliary reflux has been shown by high levels of pancreatic enzymes in bile, there have been few reports of clinical evidence of BPR in AAPBD. Recently, spiral computed tomography combined with intravenous infusion cholangiography (IVC-SCT) has been reported to be useful for visualizing the biliary anatomy, which may allow a new insight into bile flow dynamics in AAPBD. METHODS: Fifteen paediatric patients with AAPBD were examined before operation using both IVC-SCT and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Visualization of the main pancreatic duct on IVC-SCT defined the presence of BPR. Blood samples were also analysed when the initial symptom was strongly present. RESULTS: BPR was observed in six of 15 patients. Pancreatic enlargement and hyperamylasaemia were significantly more frequent in patients without BPR than in those with BPR. Levels of enzyme markers of cholestasis were also higher in the former group. CONCLUSION: The present study, using IVC-SCT, has identified clinical evidence of BPR in AAPBD. Further studies are necessary to determine the correlation between BPR and clinical manifestations.