Literature DB >> 12081734

Late results concerning feasibility and compliance from a randomized trial of ultrasonographic screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

K A Vardulaki1, N M Walker, E Couto, N E Day, S G Thompson, H A Ashton, R A P Scott.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study was an update at 10 years of a randomized trial of the efficacy of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The extent of benefit, feasibility and compliance were examined, and reasons why this intervention may fail a proportion of those screened were identified.
METHODS: A total of 6058 men aged 65 years and over were randomized to a group invited to attend ultrasonographic screening or to a control group. The mortality rate from AAA in the two arms of the trial was compared using a Poisson model. Analyses were by intention to treat.
RESULTS: There was a 21 per cent reduction in mortality rate from AAA over the 10-year follow-up (relative risk 0.79 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.53 to 1.40)). The observed relative mortality reduction peaked at 4 years with a 52 per cent reduction in the study group. Eighteen of 24 AAA deaths in the study group were among those who did not attend the first screen, or failed to comply with the follow-up protocol.
CONCLUSION: A greater awareness of the benefits of full participation in a screening programme could provide a larger and sustained mortality reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12081734     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02133.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  10 in total

1.  Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in men.

Authors:  J J Earnshaw; E Shaw; M R Whyman; K R Poskitt; B P Heather
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-08

2.  Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: screening reduces deaths related to aneurysm.

Authors:  Simon Thompson; Lois Kim; Alan Scott
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-12

3.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA): cost-effectiveness of screening, surveillance of intermediate-sized AAA, and management of symptomatic AAA.

Authors:  Marc D Silverstein; Stephen R Pitts; Elliot L Chaikof; David J Ballard
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2005-10

4.  Recommendations on screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in primary care.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Multicentre aneurysm screening study (MASS): cost effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms based on four year results from randomised controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-16

6.  Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in men: a Canadian perspective using Monte Carlo-based estimates.

Authors:  Bernard Montreuil; James Brophy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening program in Poland.

Authors:  A Jawien; B Formankiewicz; T Derezinski; A Migdalski; P Brazis; L Woda
Journal:  Gefasschirurgie       Date:  2014

8.  Evaluation the Aortic Aneurysm Remodeling After a Successful Stentgraft Implantation.

Authors:  Monika Nowicka; Agnieszka Kowalczyk; Grażyna Rusak; Przemysław Ratajczak; Bartosz Sobociński
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-13

9.  [Validity of the abdominal ecography in primary care for detection of aorta abdominal aneurism in male between 65 and 75 years].

Authors:  Laura Bravo-Merino; Noelia González-Lozano; Ruth Maroto-Salmón; Gloria Meijide-Santos; Patricio Suárez-Gil; Ana Fañanás-Mastral
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 1.137

10.  Locally applied leptin induces regional aortic wall degeneration preceding aneurysm formation in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice.

Authors:  Ming Tao; Peng Yu; Binh T Nguyen; Boaz Mizrahi; Naphtali Savion; Frank D Kolodgie; Renu Virmani; Shuai Hao; C Keith Ozaki; Jacob Schneiderman
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 8.311

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.