Literature DB >> 12081476

Dominant effect of protein charge rather than protein shape in apparent DNA bending by engineered bZIP domains.

Philip R Hardwidge1, Jason D Kahn, L James Maher.   

Abstract

We are interested in how asymmetric charge neutralization of DNA by proteins results in DNA bending. We have previously reported electrophoretic phasing experiments utilizing homodimer peptides derived from GCN4, a yeast basic zipper (bZIP) transcription factor. Here we report the results of experiments that examine the importance of peptide sequence context in DNA bending and test the hypothesis that peptide structural asymmetry causes electrophoretic anomalies in the absence of DNA bending. We prepared two new series of bZIP peptides that differed dramatically in overall size, structure, and peptide sequence near the DNA. The magnitude of apparent DNA bending is independent of the structure of the protein. This result reduces the concern that bZIP protein structure causes electrophoretic anomalies in the absence of DNA bending. In all cases, both the magnitude and direction of the apparent DNA bend angle are strongly dependent on the local peptide charge. We attempted to validate independently our results with a minicircle competition binding assay. Binding preferences of severalfold for properly phased circular versus linear DNA templates were predicted. However, no binding preferences were observed. We propose that the minicircle binding assay may be intrinsically insensitive to DNA bending or flexibility induced by the bZIP peptides studied, and we provide a unifying explanation for the discrepancies between the cyclization and electrophoretic experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12081476     DOI: 10.1021/bi020185h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  8 in total

1.  Mechanism of MutS searching for DNA mismatches and signaling repair.

Authors:  Ingrid Tessmer; Yong Yang; Jie Zhai; Chungwei Du; Peggy Hsieh; Manju M Hingorani; Dorothy A Erie
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Biophysical characterization of DNA binding from single molecule force measurements.

Authors:  Kathy R Chaurasiya; Thayaparan Paramanathan; Micah J McCauley; Mark C Williams
Journal:  Phys Life Rev       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Optical tweezers experiments resolve distinct modes of DNA-protein binding.

Authors:  Micah J McCauley; Mark C Williams
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.505

4.  Enhancement of DNA flexibility in vitro and in vivo by HMGB box A proteins carrying box B residues.

Authors:  Nadia T Sebastian; Emily M Bystry; Nicole A Becker; L James Maher
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  The roles of Sp1, Sp3, USF1/USF2 and NRF-1 in the regulation and three-dimensional structure of the Fragile X mental retardation gene promoter.

Authors:  Daman Kumari; Andrei Gabrielian; David Wheeler; Karen Usdin
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  HMGB binding to DNA: single and double box motifs.

Authors:  Micah J McCauley; Jeff Zimmerman; L James Maher; Mark C Williams
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  NMR analysis of duplex d(CGCGATCGCG)2 modified by Lambda- and Delta-[Ru(bpy)2(m-GHK)]Cl2 and DNA photocleavage study.

Authors:  Alexandra Myari; Nick Hadjiliadis; Achilleas Garoufis; Jaroslav Malina; Viktor Brabec
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.862

8.  DNA bending by bHLH charge variants.

Authors:  Robert J McDonald; Jason D Kahn; L James Maher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 16.971

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.