Literature DB >> 12081393

The processing of lexical ambiguity: homonymy and polysemy in the mental lexicon.

Ekaterini Klepousniotou1.   

Abstract

Under the theoretical assumption that lexical ambiguity is not a homogeneous phenomenon, but rather that it is subdivided into two distinct types, namely homonymy and polysemy, the present study investigated whether these different types of lexical ambiguity are psychologically real. Four types of ambiguous words, homonymous words (e.g., "pen"), polysemous words with metaphorical extensions (e.g., "eye"), polysemous words with a count/mass metonymic extension (e.g., "turkey"), and polysemous words with a producer/product metonymic extension (e.g., "Dali"), were used in a cross-modal sentence-priming lexical decision task. Overall, the theoretical distinction between homonymy and polysemy was reflected in the results of the present study, which revealed differential processing depending on the type of ambiguity. Copyright 2001 Elsevier Science (USA).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12081393     DOI: 10.1006/brln.2001.2518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  21 in total

Review 1.  Ingestion-controlling network: what's language got to do with it?

Authors:  Michael Myslobodsky; Richard Coppola
Journal:  Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.353

2.  The 'Tyranny of choices' in the ingestion-controlling network.

Authors:  Michael Myslobodsky
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.942

3.  Ambiguity advantage revisited: two meanings are better than one when accessing Chinese nouns.

Authors:  Chien-Jer Charles Lin; Kathleen Ahrens
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2009-07-07

4.  Speedy Metonymy, Tricky Metaphor, Irrelevant Compositionality: How Nonliteralness Affects Idioms in Reading and Rating.

Authors:  Diana Michl
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-12

5.  The complex interactions of context availability, polysemy, word frequency, and orthographic variables during lexical processing.

Authors:  Caitlin A Rice; Natasha Tokowicz; Scott H Fraundorf; Teljer L Liburd
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-10

6.  Impairment of homonymous processing in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Massimo Piccirilli; Patrizia D'Alessandro; Norma Micheletti; Sara Macone; Laura Scarponi; Paola Arcelli; Stefania Maria Petrillo; Mauro Silvestrini; Simona Luzzi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Neurocognitive correlates of category ambiguous verb processing: The single versus dual lexical entry hypotheses.

Authors:  Sladjana Lukic; Aya Meltzer-Asscher; James Higgins; Todd B Parrish; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  The Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Listening Effort in Adults With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Julia Gordon; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Generalization of a Novel, Implicit Treatment for Coarse Coding Deficit in Right Hemisphere Brain Damage: A Single Subject Experiment.

Authors:  Connie A Tompkins; Victoria L Scharp; Kimberly Meigh; Margaret Lehman Blake; Julie Wambaugh
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 2.773

10.  Listeners and readers generalize their experience with word meanings across modalities.

Authors:  Rebecca A Gilbert; Matthew H Davis; M Gareth Gaskell; Jennifer M Rodd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.