Literature DB >> 12080252

Laparoscopic suture closure of perforated duodenal peptic ulcer.

Jean-Pierre Arnaud1, Jean-Jacques Tuech, Roberto Bergamaschi, Patrick Pessaux, Nicolas Regenet.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of a continuous series of 30 patients with perforated duodenal peptic ulcers treated by a laparoscopic approach. Between January 1996 and December 1998, 30 patients (24 males, 6 females) with a mean age of 69.2 years were operated on with a laparoscopic approach. Laparoscopic treatment included peritoneal lavage, suture of the perforation, and omental patching in 24 cases. A conversion to laparotomy was necessary in five patients (16.6%). Mean operative time was 92 minutes (range: 58-114) and mean hospital stay was 6 days (range: 4-16). Mortality and morbidity rates were 6.6% (n = 2) and 16.6% (n = 5). With a median follow-up of 12 months, 96% of the patients were in good condition; one patient had recurrent duodenal ulceration. The results of our study show the feasibility of the laparoscopic approach for perforated peptic ulcer repair, with acceptable mortality and morbidity rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12080252     DOI: 10.1097/00129689-200206000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  11 in total

1.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: the"three-stitch" Graham patch technique.

Authors:  P W F Lam; M C S Lam; E K L Hui; Y W Sun; F P T Mok
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: single-center results.

Authors:  Simone Guadagni; Ismail Cengeli; Christian Galatioto; Niccolò Furbetta; Vincenzo Lippolis Piero; Giuseppe Zocco; Massimo Seccia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Multimedia article: management of duodenal ulcer perforation with combined laparoscopic and endoscopic methods.

Authors:  H A Alvarado-Aparicio; M Moreno-Portillo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcers: analysis of outcomes and identification of predictive factors of conversion.

Authors:  Dario Tartaglia; Silvia Strambi; Federico Coccolini; Alessio Mazzoni; Mario Miccoli; Camilla Cremonini; Enrico Cicuttin; Massimo Chiarugi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-10-03

5.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Lau
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcers: laparoscopic versus open approach.

Authors:  Victor Vakayil; Brent Bauman; Keaton Joppru; Reema Mallick; Christopher Tignanelli; John Connett; Sayeed Ikramuddin; James V Harmon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer by running suture.

Authors:  Jörg Köninger; Peter Böttinger; Jens Redecke; Michael Butters
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  An Updated Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer.

Authors:  Chunhua Zhou; Weizhi Wang; Jiwei Wang; Xiaoyu Zhang; Qun Zhang; Bowen Li; Zekuan Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Laparoscopic versus Open Omental Patch Repair for Early Presentation of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Matched Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Daniel Jin Keat Lee; MaDong Ye; Keith Haozhe Sun; Vishalkumar G Shelat; Aaryan Koura
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2016-09-19

Review 10.  Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature.

Authors:  Mariëtta J O E Bertleff; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.