Literature DB >> 12080036

Production of cloned cattle from in vitro systems.

Erik J Forsberg1, Nikolai S Strelchenko, Monica L Augenstein, Jeffery M Betthauser, Lynette A Childs, Kenneth J Eilertsen, Joellyn M Enos, Todd M Forsythe, Paul J Golueke, Richard W Koppang, Gail Lange, Tiffany L Lesmeister, Kelly S Mallon, Greg D Mell, Pavla M Misica, Marvin M Pace, Martha Pfister-Genskow, Gary R Voelker, Steven R Watt, Michael D Bishop.   

Abstract

The pregnancy initiation and maintenance rates of nuclear transfer embryos produced from several bovine cell types were measured to determine which cell types produced healthy calves and had growth characteristics that would allow for genetic manipulation. Considerable variability between cell types from one animal and the same cell type from different animals was observed. In general, cultured fetal cells performed better with respect to pregnancy initiation and calving than adult cells with the exception of cumulous cells, which produced the highest overall pregnancy and calving rates. The cell type that combined relatively high pregnancy initiation and calving rates with growth characteristics that allowed for extended proliferation in culture were fetal genital ridge (GR) cells. Cultured GR cells used in nuclear transfer and embryo transfer initiated pregnancies in 40% of recipient heifers (197), and of all recipients that received nuclear transfer embryos, 9% produced live calves. Cultured GR cells doubled as many as 85 times overall and up to 75 times after dilution to single-cell culture. A comparison between transfected and nontransfected cells showed that transfected cells had lower pregnancy initiation (22% versus 32%) and calving (3.4% versus 8.9%) rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12080036     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod67.1.327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  8 in total

Review 1.  Artificial cloning of domestic animals.

Authors:  Carol L Keefer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cellular reprogramming for the creation of patient-specific embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Jose B Cibelli; Arif M Kocabas; Zeki Beyhan; Pablo J Ross
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  Development of a modified method of handmade cloning in dromedary camel.

Authors:  Fariba Moulavi; Sayyed Morteza Hosseini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Epigenetic manipulation to improve mouse SCNT embryonic development.

Authors:  Yamei Li; Qiang Sun
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 5.  Cloning animals by somatic cell nuclear transfer--biological factors.

Authors:  X Cindy Tian; Chikara Kubota; Brian Enright; Xiangzhong Yang
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Generation of interleukin-2 receptor gamma gene knockout pigs from somatic cells genetically modified by zinc finger nuclease-encoding mRNA.

Authors:  Masahito Watanabe; Kazuaki Nakano; Hitomi Matsunari; Taisuke Matsuda; Miki Maehara; Takahiro Kanai; Mirina Kobayashi; Yukina Matsumura; Rieko Sakai; Momoko Kuramoto; Gota Hayashida; Yoshinori Asano; Shuko Takayanagi; Yoshikazu Arai; Kazuhiro Umeyama; Masaki Nagaya; Yutaka Hanazono; Hiroshi Nagashima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Lessons Learned from Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.

Authors:  Chantel Gouveia; Carin Huyser; Dieter Egli; Michael S Pepper
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Extranuclear Inheritance of Mitochondrial Genome and Epigenetic Reprogrammability of Chromosomal Telomeres in Somatic Cell Cloning of Mammals.

Authors:  Marcin Samiec; Maria Skrzyszowska
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.