PURPOSE: To study the response of the Dunning prostate carcinoma (R3327-AT1 subline) to continuous low dose-rate (CLDR) and pulsed dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After subcutaneous tumour transplantation into the thigh of the Copenhagen rat, doses of 0, 20, 30, 40 and 50 Gy were applied to the tumour surface (tumour diameter 9+/-1mm). Eight animals were irradiated per dose group and exposure condition. Interstitial PDR ((192)Ir source, 37 GBq) and CLDR ((192)Ir seed, 150 MBq) brachytherapy were carried out with 0.75 Gy/pulse h(-1) and a dose-rate of 0.75Gyh(-1), respectively. Treatment response was assessed in terms of growth delay expressed as the time (T(5)) required for each tumour to reach five times the initial tumour volume. RESULTS: The median T(5) times for the CLDR groups (in the order: control, 20, 30, 40, 50 Gy) were 12 (12), 54.5 (21), 64.5 (31), 85.5 (51), and 65 (47.5) days. Values after PDR brachytherapy are given in parentheses and resulted in a significantly impaired tumour growth delay (log-rank test) in the 20Gy (p =0.006) and 30 Gy (p =0.036) groups. No significant difference was found in the 40-50 Gy dose range. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous results and predictions of biological models we observed dose-dependent differential effects of PDR and CLDR brachytherapy with reduced efficacy of PDR in the lower dose range.
PURPOSE: To study the response of the Dunning prostate carcinoma (R3327-AT1 subline) to continuous low dose-rate (CLDR) and pulsed dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After subcutaneous tumour transplantation into the thigh of the Copenhagen rat, doses of 0, 20, 30, 40 and 50 Gy were applied to the tumour surface (tumour diameter 9+/-1mm). Eight animals were irradiated per dose group and exposure condition. Interstitial PDR ((192)Ir source, 37 GBq) and CLDR ((192)Ir seed, 150 MBq) brachytherapy were carried out with 0.75 Gy/pulse h(-1) and a dose-rate of 0.75Gyh(-1), respectively. Treatment response was assessed in terms of growth delay expressed as the time (T(5)) required for each tumour to reach five times the initial tumour volume. RESULTS: The median T(5) times for the CLDR groups (in the order: control, 20, 30, 40, 50 Gy) were 12 (12), 54.5 (21), 64.5 (31), 85.5 (51), and 65 (47.5) days. Values after PDR brachytherapy are given in parentheses and resulted in a significantly impaired tumour growth delay (log-rank test) in the 20Gy (p =0.006) and 30 Gy (p =0.036) groups. No significant difference was found in the 40-50 Gy dose range. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous results and predictions of biological models we observed dose-dependent differential effects of PDR and CLDR brachytherapy with reduced efficacy of PDR in the lower dose range.
Authors: Christina Skourou; P Jack Hoopes; Summer L Gibbs-Strauss; David J Gladstone; Rendall Strawbridge; Keith D Paulsen Journal: Int J Radiat Biol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 2.694