Literature DB >> 12078983

Does size really matter? Effects of fish surface area on the settlement and initial survival of Lepeophtheirus salmonis, an ectoparasite of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar.

C S Tucker1, C Sommerville, R Wootten.   

Abstract

The effect of the size of the surface area of a fish host on settlement and initial survival of Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Krøyer, 1837) was determined. Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. of various sizes-small (43 +/- 4 g), medium (173 +/- 32 g) and large (644 +/- 62 g)-were initially examined to ascertain their respective body surface area, excluding gill surface. The initial examination showed a size-dependent body to fin area ratio, with the fin area of small fish representing 34% of the total body area and the fin area of medium and large fish representing 26 and 23%, respectively. Regression analysis of the body weight and standard length against total body surface area gave a good correlation and high R2 values. Two simultaneous experimental infections with approximately 7,000 copepodids of L. salmonis were carried out on fish populations of mixed sizes consisting of 30 small fish, 10 medium-sized fish and 5 large fish, with an approximate total surface area per size group of 2700 cm2. Higher numbers of parasites were found on the small size group, which also had the highest parasite density, with 0.25 and 0.45 parasites cm(-2). Comparison of samples of 5 fish per experimental group revealed that the larger fish had the highest mean numbers of parasites, but the smaller fish still retained the highest density. There was a statistically significantly higher settlement on the fins than on the remainder of the body surface in all size groups. Highest numbers of parasites were particularly found on the dorsal and pectoral fins. Examination of the surface surface area revealed that the dorsal fin had the greater parasite density, with >2 parasites cm(-2) in all fish size groups. These data provide insight into the effects of the amount of host surface area available on parasite settlement and survival, and highlight the potentially increased susceptibility of farmed salmon smolts to infection of this ectoparasite.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12078983     DOI: 10.3354/dao049145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Aquat Organ        ISSN: 0177-5103            Impact factor:   1.802


  6 in total

1.  New occurrence of parasitic isopod Argathona sp. (Stebbing, 1905) from Epinephelus undulosus in the Tuticorin coast, Gulf of Mannar region.

Authors:  Gurusamy Chelladurai; Srinivasan Balakrishanan; Ganapathy Rameshkumar; Kannan Banumathi
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2015-05-08

2.  Transmission of fish parasites into grouper mariculture (Serranidae: Epinephelus coioides (Hamilton, 1822)) in Lampung Bay, Indonesia.

Authors:  Sonja Rückert; Sven Klimpel; Saleh Al-Quraishy; Heinz Mehlhorn; Harry W Palm
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Parasitism of Argulus japonicus in cultured and wild fish of Guangdong, China with new record of three hosts.

Authors:  Muhamd Alsarakibi; Hicham Wadeh; Guoqing Li
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  Aeromonas salmonicida binds differentially to mucins isolated from skin and intestinal regions of Atlantic salmon in an N-acetylneuraminic acid-dependent manner.

Authors:  János T Padra; Henrik Sundh; Chunsheng Jin; Niclas G Karlsson; Kristina Sundell; Sara K Lindén
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 5.  Salmon lice--impact on wild salmonids and salmon aquaculture.

Authors:  O Torrissen; S Jones; F Asche; A Guttormsen; O T Skilbrei; F Nilsen; T E Horsberg; D Jackson
Journal:  J Fish Dis       Date:  2013-01-13       Impact factor: 2.767

6.  Modeling parasite dynamics on farmed salmon for precautionary conservation management of wild salmon.

Authors:  Luke A Rogers; Stephanie J Peacock; Peter McKenzie; Sharon DeDominicis; Simon R M Jones; Peter Chandler; Michael G G Foreman; Crawford W Revie; Martin Krkošek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.