Literature DB >> 12078378

Effectiveness of quality improvement: learning from evaluations.

K Walshe1, T Freeman.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of many quality improvement interventions has been studied, and research suggests that most have highly variable effects which depend heavily on the context in which they are used and the way they are implemented. This has three important implications. Firstly, it means that the approach to quality improvement used in an organisation probably matters less than how and by whom it is used. Rather than taking up, trying, and then discarding a succession of different quality improvement techniques, organisations should probably choose one carefully and then persevere to make it work. Secondly, future research into quality improvement interventions should be directed more at understanding how and why they work--the determinants of effectiveness--rather than measuring whether they work. Thirdly, some element of evaluation should be incorporated into every quality improvement programme so that its effectiveness can be monitored and the information can be used to improve the systems for improvement.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12078378      PMCID: PMC1743560          DOI: 10.1136/qhc.11.1.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  21 in total

1.  Evangelism of quality.

Authors:  Kieran Walshe
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  The role of formative evaluation in implementation research and the QUERI experience.

Authors:  Cheryl B Stetler; Marcia W Legro; Carolyn M Wallace; Candice Bowman; Marylou Guihan; Hildi Hagedorn; Barbara Kimmel; Nancy D Sharp; Jeffrey L Smith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Association of hospital participation in a quality reporting program with surgical outcomes and expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Nicholas H Osborne; Lauren H Nicholas; Andrew M Ryan; Jyothi R Thumma; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  How team-based reflection affects quality improvement implementation: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Eric K Shaw; Jenna Howard; Rebecca S Etz; Shawna V Hudson; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.926

5.  Adoption and Initial Implementation of a National Integrated Care Programme for Diabetes: A Realist Evaluation.

Authors:  Kate O'Neill; Fiona Riordan; Emmy Racine; Marsha Tracey; Chrysanthi Papoutsi; Patricia M Kearney; Sheena M McHugh
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.913

Review 6.  How safe is the safety paradigm?

Authors:  O A Arah; N S Klazinga
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-06

7.  Validating and determining the weight of items used for evaluating clinical governance implementation based on analytic hierarchy process model.

Authors:  Elaheh Hooshmand; Sogand Tourani; Hamid Ravaghi; Ali Vafaee Najar; Marziye Meraji; Hossein Ebrahimipour
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-04-08

8.  Lost in translation: a case-study of the travel of lean thinking in a hospital.

Authors:  Hege Andersen; Kjell Arne Røvik
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare.

Authors:  Michael J Taylor; Chris McNicholas; Chris Nicolay; Ara Darzi; Derek Bell; Julie E Reed
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Publication guidelines for quality improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project.

Authors:  Frank Davidoff; Paul Batalden; David Stevens; Greg Ogrinc; Susan E Mooney
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-01-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.