Literature DB >> 12075667

OILing the way to machine understandable bioinformatics resources.

Robert Stevens1, Carole Goble, Ian Horrocks, Sean Bechhofer.   

Abstract

The complex questions and analyses posed by biologists, as well as the diverse data resources they develop, require the fusion of evidence from different, independently developed, and heterogeneous resources. The web, as an enabler for interoperability, has been an excellent mechanism for data publication and transportation. Successful exchange and integration of information, however, depends on a shared language for communication (a terminology) and a shared understanding of what the data means (an ontology). Without this kind of understanding, semantic heterogeneity remains a problem for both humans and machines. One means of dealing with heterogeneity in bioinformatics resources is through terminology founded upon an ontology. Bioinformatics resources tend to be rich in human readable and understandable annotation, with each resource using its own terminology. These resources are machine readable, but not machine understandable. Ontologies have a role in increasing this machine understanding, reducing the semantic heterogeneity between resources and thus promoting the flexible and reliable interoperation of bioinformatics resources. This paper describes a solution derived from the semantic web [a machine understandable world-wide web (WWW)], the ontology inference layer (OIL), as a solution for semantic bioinformatics resources. The nature of the heterogeneity problems are presented along with a description of how metadata from domain ontologies can be used to alleviate this problem. A companion paper in this issue gives an example of the development of a bio-ontology using OIL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12075667     DOI: 10.1109/titb.2002.1006300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed        ISSN: 1089-7771


  4 in total

Review 1.  Bio-ontologies: current trends and future directions.

Authors:  Olivier Bodenreider; Robert Stevens
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 2.  Understanding and using the meaning of statements in a bio-ontology: recasting the Gene Ontology in OWL.

Authors:  Mikel Egaña Aranguren; Sean Bechhofer; Phillip Lord; Ulrike Sattler; Robert Stevens
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  HuPSON: the human physiology simulation ontology.

Authors:  Michaela Gündel; Erfan Younesi; Ashutosh Malhotra; Jiali Wang; Hui Li; Bijun Zhang; Bernard de Bono; Heinz-Theodor Mevissen; Martin Hofmann-Apitius
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2013-11-22

4.  Biomolecular Relationships Discovered from Biological Labyrinth and Lost in Ocean of Literature: Community Efforts Can Rescue Until Automated Artificial Intelligence Takes Over.

Authors:  Rajinder Gupta; Shrikant S Mantri
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.599

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.