Literature DB >> 12074339

Validation of a two-pool model for the kinetics of beta2-microglobulin.

S Stiller1, X Q Xu, N Gruner, J Vienken, H Mann.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Secondary amyloidosis due to beta-2-microglobulin (beta2-m) is a serious long-term complication in patients on regular dialysis therapy. Beta2-m can be considered a middle-molecule marker used to facilitate the assessment of dialysis efficacy. For this purpose, a validated model that calculates characteristic efficacy parameters, such as Kt/V, TAC and generation rate, is needed. There is general agreement that beta2-m-kinetics should be described by a two-pool model, but little has been published to validate such an approach. We measured the beta2-m concentration profiles of eight stable patients during hemodialysis (HD) at the start of treatment, after 30 minutes, after 60 minutes, and every hour until the end. Thereafter they were measured at 10-minute intervals for an hour. The dialyser clearances were determined from the plasma concentrations in front of and behind the dialyser twice during each session - after 1 hour, and 4 hours from the start of treatment. The kinetic parameters of a two-pool model (e.g. the compartment volumes V1 and V2, the mass transfer coefficient K12 and the generation rate G) were determined from the optimal fit of the measured concentration profile. The table below summarises the results by giving the mean and standard deviation for each parameter: [table: see text]. Inter-individual differences in V1/V2 and K12 were high, ranging from 2.5 to 10.0 for V/V2 and from 26 to 140 for K12. Error analysis suggested that these wide ranges were due to the method and that in reality the probable range of V is 25-36% of TBW, of V1/V2 3.5-5.3, and of K12 30-80 ml/min. With standard values for these three parameters (V = 30% of TBW, V/V2 = 4.4 and K12 = 55 ml/m), equal for all patients, and their respective ranges, Kt/W can be calculated with a standard deviation of 13%. Kt/W > 1.2 secures the maximum possible beta2-m removal with three HD treatments a week.
CONCLUSIONS: The parameters of a two-pool model of beta2-m kinetics can be derived from concentration profiles obtained under routine dialysis conditions, but accuracy is not completely satisfactory. Similar to the dialysis dose for urea (Kt/Vurea) the dialysis dose for beta2-m (Kt/Vbeta2-m) can be calculated from the pre- and post-dialysis concentrations of beta2-m, body weight, ultrafiltration and dialysis time. Kt/Vbeta2-m > 1.2 secures the maximum possible removal of beta2-m in HD with three sessions per week.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12074339     DOI: 10.1177/039139880202500511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Artif Organs        ISSN: 0391-3988            Impact factor:   1.595


  11 in total

Review 1.  Once upon a time in dialysis: the last days of Kt/V?

Authors:  Raymond Vanholder; Griet Glorieux; Sunny Eloot
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 2.  Home haemodialysis and uraemic toxin removal: does a happy marriage exist?

Authors:  Raymond Vanholder; Sunny Eloot; Nathalie Neirynck; Wim Van Biesen
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 3.  An update on uremic toxins.

Authors:  N Neirynck; R Vanholder; E Schepers; S Eloot; A Pletinck; G Glorieux
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Considerations in the statistical analysis of hemodialysis patient survival.

Authors:  Christos Argyropoulos; Chung-Chou H Chang; Laura Plantinga; Nancy Fink; Neil Powe; Mark Unruh
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Protein-bound solute removal during extended multipass versus standard hemodialysis.

Authors:  Sunny Eloot; Wim Van Biesen; Mette Axelsen; Griet Glorieux; Robert Smith Pedersen; James Goya Heaf
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 6.  Revisiting the Middle Molecule Hypothesis of Uremic Toxicity: A Systematic Review of Beta 2 Microglobulin Population Kinetics and Large Scale Modeling of Hemodialysis Trials In Silico.

Authors:  Maria Eleni Roumelioti; Thomas Nolin; Mark L Unruh; Christos Argyropoulos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A novel mathematical model of protein-bound uremic toxin kinetics during hemodialysis.

Authors:  Vaibhav Maheshwari; Stephan Thijssen; Xia Tao; Doris Fuertinger; Franz Kappel; Peter Kotanko
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition.

Authors:  Vaibhav Maheshwari; Stephan Thijssen; Xia Tao; Doris H Fuertinger; Franz Kappel; Peter Kotanko
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Comparison of toxin removal outcomes in online hemodiafiltration and intra-dialytic exercise in high-flux hemodialysis: a prospective randomized open-label clinical study protocol.

Authors:  Vaibhav Maheshwari; Lakshminarayanan Samavedham; Gade Pandu Rangaiah; Yijun Loy; Lieng Hsi Ling; Sunil Sethi; Titus Lau Wai Leong
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 2.388

10.  Protein-Bound Uremic Toxin Profiling as a Tool to Optimize Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Sunny Eloot; Daniel Schneditz; Tom Cornelis; Wim Van Biesen; Griet Glorieux; Annemie Dhondt; Jeroen Kooman; Raymond Vanholder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.