Literature DB >> 12074230

Effect of light source and specimen thickness on the surface hardness of resin composite.

Richard B Price1, Tore Dérand, Robert W Loney, Pantelis Andreou.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the Knoop hardness of different thicknesses of resin composite irradiated using either a plasma arc curing (PAC) light, or a quartz tungsten halogen (QTH) light.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 2.5-mm diameter hole was drilled through the center of 2, 3, 4, and 5-mm thick discs of enamel and dentin. This hole was filled with either Filtek P60 or Prodigy Condensable composite and irradiated in bulk using: (a) a PAC light with an 8-mm, 470 nm light guide for 3 seconds, (b) a QTH light with an 8-mm standard light guide for 40 seconds (QTH+S), or (c) a QTH light with a 13/8-mm Turbo light guide for 40 seconds (QTH+T). Immediately after irradiating the composite, the surface hardness was measured at the bottom and then the top. Hardness values were remeasured after 24-hour and 7-day storage in water at 37 degrees C. The hardness values were compared using the Analysis of Variance for Repeated Measures and Least Squares Means test for multiple comparisons (LSM test) at P< 0.05.
RESULTS: The power density delivered by each light was: PAC over 1999 mW/cm2, QTH+S 588 mW/cm2, and QTH+T 844 mW/cm2. Both the thickness of the composite and the light source had a significant effect on the hardness. Overall, using the QTH+T produced the highest hardness values and the PAC light the lowest values. For all 2-mm thick specimens, irrespective of the light source, the hardness values at the bottom were not significantly different from their top hardness values measured at the same time. For the 3-mm thick specimens using the QTH+T, the hardness values at the bottom of both composites were not significantly different from their top hardness values at all time intervals. For the 3-mm thick specimens using the QTH+S, the bottom hardness values were not significantly different from those at the top for P60 only, and only at 24 hours and 7 days, but not when measured immediately. For all the 4 and 5-mm thick specimens, the hardness values at the bottom were all significantly different from those at the top measured at the same time interval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12074230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  14 in total

1.  Curing effectiveness of single-peak and multi-peak led light curing units on tpo-containing resin composites with different chromatic characteristics.

Authors:  G Conte; M Panetta; M Mancini; A Fabianelli; A Brotzu; R Sorge; L Cianconi
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-09-27

Review 2.  [Effect of preheating on the properties of resin composite].

Authors:  Jing Xue; Bi-Na Yang
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-12-01

3.  Effects of light curing method and exposure time on mechanical properties of resin based dental materials.

Authors:  A Riza Alpöz; Fahinur Ertugrul; Dilsah Cogulu; Asli Topaloglu Ak; Metin Tanoglu; Elçin Kaya
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2008-01

4.  Effect of resin thickness on the microhardness and optical properties of bulk-fill resin composites.

Authors:  Eun-Ha Kim; Kyoung-Hwa Jung; Sung-Ae Son; Bock Hur; Yong-Hoon Kwon; Jeong-Kil Park
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2015-01-13

5.  Knowledge and Attitude of Dental Clinicians towards Light-Curing Units: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Dana Al-Senan; Fatin Ageel; Amani Aldosari; Haifa Maktabi
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-06-14

6.  Flexural strength of a composite resin light cured with different exposure modes and immersed in ethanol or distilled water media.

Authors:  Saulo Galvão Dos Santos; Marcos Ribeiro Moysés; Carlos Eduardo Pinto Alcântara; José Carlos Rabelo Ribeiro; João Gustavo Rabelo Ribeiro
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2012-10

7.  Conversion degrees of resin composites using different light sources.

Authors:  Bora Ozturk; Nevin Cobanoglu; Ali Rıza Cetin; Beniz Gunduz
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2013-01

8.  Influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin.

Authors:  Flávio Hb Aguiar; Kelly Rm Andrade; Débora An Leite Lima; Gláucia Mb Ambrosano; José R Lovadino
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2009-05-06

9.  Does an additional UV LED improve the degree of conversion and Knoop Hardness of light-shade composite resins?

Authors:  Maria Cecília Caldas Giorgi; Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar; Luís Eduardo Silva Soares; Airton Abrahão Martin; Priscila Christiane Suzy Liporoni; Luís Alexandre Maffei Sartini Paulillo
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2012-10

10.  Influence of the distance of the curing light source and composite shade on hardness of two composites.

Authors:  Thaís Thomé; Washington Steagall; Arlene Tachibana; Sheila Regina Maia Braga; Miriam Lacalle Turbino
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.