S L Merten1, R P Jiang, D Caminer. 1. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Following excisional surgery for head and neck cancer, most complex defects are reconstructed using microvascular free tissue transfer. These methods offer many advantages; however, they are of increasing complexity with attendant risks of flap loss and donor site problems. The submental artery island flap is a recently described local flap that may be used for reconstruction of the lower and middle thirds of the face and oral cavity, and offers the advantages of simplicity, reliability and excellent cosmesis. We have been using this flap as an alternative to free tissue transfer, and in this paper we present our series of 11 cases, after a review of the recent literature, anatomy and surgical technique. The advantages and limitations of the use of this flap are presented. METHODS: A consecutive series of 11 patients in which this reconstruction was performed was reviewed retrospectively, and the results studied. Advantages and disadvantages of this reconstructive method were determined to define appropriate indications and contra-indications for its use. RESULTS: We have used this flap in 11 patients for post-excisional soft tissue reconstruction of the head and neck, both as skin and as a mucosal replacement. In all but two patients the results were satisfactory, with excellent cosmesis when used as skin replacement. One patient required secondary debulking and one had complete flap loss. In all, the donor site was satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: The Submenal Artery Island Flap is a useful addition to the reconstructive surgeon's options and has definite advantages over distant flaps in terms of ease of dissection, final cosmetic appearance and donor site appearance.
BACKGROUND: Following excisional surgery for head and neck cancer, most complex defects are reconstructed using microvascular free tissue transfer. These methods offer many advantages; however, they are of increasing complexity with attendant risks of flap loss and donor site problems. The submental artery island flap is a recently described local flap that may be used for reconstruction of the lower and middle thirds of the face and oral cavity, and offers the advantages of simplicity, reliability and excellent cosmesis. We have been using this flap as an alternative to free tissue transfer, and in this paper we present our series of 11 cases, after a review of the recent literature, anatomy and surgical technique. The advantages and limitations of the use of this flap are presented. METHODS: A consecutive series of 11 patients in which this reconstruction was performed was reviewed retrospectively, and the results studied. Advantages and disadvantages of this reconstructive method were determined to define appropriate indications and contra-indications for its use. RESULTS: We have used this flap in 11 patients for post-excisional soft tissue reconstruction of the head and neck, both as skin and as a mucosal replacement. In all but two patients the results were satisfactory, with excellent cosmesis when used as skin replacement. One patient required secondary debulking and one had complete flap loss. In all, the donor site was satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: The Submenal Artery Island Flap is a useful addition to the reconstructive surgeon's options and has definite advantages over distant flaps in terms of ease of dissection, final cosmetic appearance and donor site appearance.
Authors: Muhammad Faisal; Mohammad Adeel; Sheryar Riaz; Abdullah Anwar; Asma Rashid; Sadaf Usman; Arif Jamshed; Raza Hussain Journal: Ann Maxillofac Surg Date: 2018 Jul-Dec