Literature DB >> 12072922

Differential fluorescent staining method for detection of bacteria in blood cultures, cerebrospinal fluid and other clinical specimens.

P Fazii1, E Ciancaglini, G Riario Sforza.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate a differential staining method to distinguish gram-positive from gram-negative bacteria in fluorescence. The method is based on two fluorochromes, one acting in the wavelength of red, i.e. the acridine orange, and another acting in the wavelength of green, i.e. the fluorescein. With this method, gram-positive bacteria appear yellow and gram-negative bacteria appear green. In view of the importance of a rapid aetiological diagnosis in cases of septicaemia, the differential staining method in fluorescence was compared with Gram stain for the detection of bacteria in blood. Of 5,820 blood cultures entered into the study and identified by the Bactec 9120 fluorescent series instrument (Becton Dickinson Europe, France), 774 were positive. Of the 774 positive cultures, 689 yielded only a single organism. The differential staining method in fluorescence detected 626 of the 689 cultures, while Gram stain detected 468. On the basis of these results, the sensitivity of the differential staining method in fluorescence was 90.9%, while that of Gram stain was 67.9%. The difference between the two methods was statistically significant ( P<0.001). The differential fluorescent staining method was more sensitive than Gram stain in the detection of bacteria in blood cultures during the incubation period. This technique provides a rapid, simple and highly sensitive staining method that can be used in conjunction with subculture methods. Whereas subculture requires an incubation period of 18-24 h, the fluorescent staining technique can detect bacteria on the same day that smears are prepared and examined. The differential fluorescent staining method was also evaluated for its ability to detect microorganisms in cerebrospinal fluid and other clinical specimens. The microorganisms were easily detected, even when bacterial counts in the specimens were low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12072922     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-002-0731-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  4 in total

1.  Effects of microflora on the neonatal development of gut mucosal T cells and myeloid cells in the mouse.

Authors:  Amanda M Williams; Christopher S J Probert; Renata Stepankova; Helena Tlaskalova-Hogenova; Anne Phillips; Paul W Bland
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 7.397

2.  Comparative Study in Early Neonates with Septicemia by Blood Culture, Staining Techniques and C - Reactive Protein (CRP).

Authors:  V Dhanalakshmi; E Suguna Sivakumar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-03-01

3.  Comparison of acridine orange fluorescent microscopy and gram stain light microscopy for the rapid detection of bacteria in cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  Supriya Sharma; Jyoti Acharya; Megha Raj Banjara; Prakash Ghimire; Anjana Singh
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2020-01-13

4.  Effects of monocolonization with Escherichia coli strains O6K13 and Nissle 1917 on the development of experimentally induced acute and chronic intestinal inflammation in germ-free immunocompetent and immunodeficient mice.

Authors:  T Hudcovic; R Stepánková; H Kozákova; T Hrncír; H Tlaskalová-Hogenová
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.629

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.