Literature DB >> 12072852

Comparison of tibial nerve H-reflex excitability after cervical and lumbar spine manipulation.

J Donald Dishman1, Brian M Cunningham, Jeanmarie Burke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous investigations indicate that spinal manipulation leads to short-term attenuation of alpha-motoneuron excitability, when assessed by means of the Hoffmann reflex. Past studies, however, are limited to regional effects, such as lumbar manipulation effects on lumbar alpha-motoneuron activity.
OBJECTIVE: This study compared and contrasted the effects of cervical and lumbar spine manipulation on the excitability of the lumbar alpha-motoneuronal pool in human subjects without low back pain, and compared the effects of cervical (nonregional) and lumbar (regional) spinal manipulation on lumbar alpha-motoneuron pool excitability in healthy subjects. The specific aim of this study was to determine if the inhibitory effects on the lumbar alpha-motoneuron pool associated with spinal manipulation are limited to the specific region in which the manipulative procedure is applied, or if rostral (cervical) manipulation can also influence caudal (lumbar) motoneuron excitability.
METHOD: Thirty-six nonpatient human subjects were used to study the effect of cervical and lumbar spinal manipulation on the amplitude of the tibial nerve Hoffmann reflex, recorded from the gastrocnemius muscle. The Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) technique allows for an indirect index of motoneuron pool excitability by means of peripheral nerve Ia-afferent fiber stimulation. Reflexes were recorded before and after spinal manipulative procedures.
RESULTS: Lumbar spinal manipulation, as measured by amplitude changes of the tibial nerve H-reflex, attenuated lumbar alpha-motoneuronal activity. Suppression of motoneuronal excitability was significant (P <.05) but transient, with a return to baseline within 60 seconds after manipulation. Cervical spinal manipulation had no significant effect on lumbar motoneuron activity.
CONCLUSION: These data indicate that the inhibitory effects of spinal manipulation on motoneuronal excitability are regional, rather than global.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12072852     DOI: 10.1067/mmt.2002.124420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  6 in total

1.  Characteristics of Paraspinal Muscle Spindle Response to Mechanically Assisted Spinal Manipulation: A Preliminary Report.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar; Randall S Sozio; Michael A K Liebschner; Joshua W Little; Maruti R Gudavalli
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 2.  A regional interdependence model of musculoskeletal dysfunction: research, mechanisms, and clinical implications.

Authors:  Derrick G Sueki; Joshua A Cleland; Robert S Wainner
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2013-05

3.  A global view on how local muscular fatigue affects human performance.

Authors:  Márcio F Goethel; Mauro Gonçalves; Cayque Brietzke; Adalgiso C Cardozo; João P Vilas-Boas; Ulysses F Ervilha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Manual therapy directed at the knee or lumbopelvic region does not influence quadriceps spinal reflex excitability.

Authors:  Terry L Grindstaff; Brian G Pietrosimone; Lindsay D Sauer; D Casey Kerrigan; James T Patrie; Jay Hertel; Christopher D Ingersoll
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2014-04-13

5.  Spinal manipulative therapy has an immediate effect on thermal pain sensitivity in people with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Michael E Robinson; Giorgio Zeppieri; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-10-01

6.  Chiropractic Care of a 10-Year-Old Boy With Nonorganic Gait Disorder: A Case Report.

Authors:  David E Wasylynko
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2017-03-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.