OBJECTIVE: During hypothermic cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a body core temperature <30 degrees C administration of a vasopressor to support coronary perfusion pressure is controversial. The purpose of the current study was to assess the effects of a single 0.4-unit/kg dose of vasopressin on coronary perfusion pressure, defibrillation success, and 1-hr survival in a pig model of hypothermic closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation combined with rewarming. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study in an established pig model. SETTING: University hospital research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Fifteen 12- to 16-wk-old domestic pigs. INTERVENTIONS: Pigs were surface cooled to a body core temperature of 26 degrees C and ventricular fibrillation was induced. After 15 mins of untreated cardiac arrest, manual closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation and thoracic lavage with 40 degrees C warmed tap water were started. After 3 mins of external chest compression, animals were assigned randomly to receive vasopressin (0.4 units/kg, n = 8; or saline placebo, n = 7). Defibrillation was attempted 10 mins after drug administration. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Compared with saline placebo treated-animals, coronary perfusion pressure in vasopressin-treated pigs was significantly higher 90 secs (36 +/- 5 mm Hg vs. 7 +/- 4 mm Hg, p =.000) to 10 mins (24 +/- 4 mm Hg vs. 8 +/- 4 mm Hg, p =.000) after drug administration. Restoration of spontaneous circulation and 1 hr survival were significantly higher in vasopressin animals compared with saline placebo (8 of 8 vasopressin pigs vs. 0 of 7 placebo pigs, p <.001). CONCLUSIONS: A single 0.4-unit/kg dose of vasopressin administered at a body core temperature <30 degrees C significantly improved defibrillation success and 1-hr survival in a pig model of hypothermic cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
OBJECTIVE: During hypothermic cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a body core temperature <30 degrees C administration of a vasopressor to support coronary perfusion pressure is controversial. The purpose of the current study was to assess the effects of a single 0.4-unit/kg dose of vasopressin on coronary perfusion pressure, defibrillation success, and 1-hr survival in a pig model of hypothermic closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation combined with rewarming. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study in an established pig model. SETTING: University hospital research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Fifteen 12- to 16-wk-old domestic pigs. INTERVENTIONS:Pigs were surface cooled to a body core temperature of 26 degrees C and ventricular fibrillation was induced. After 15 mins of untreated cardiac arrest, manual closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation and thoracic lavage with 40 degrees C warmed tap water were started. After 3 mins of external chest compression, animals were assigned randomly to receive vasopressin (0.4 units/kg, n = 8; or saline placebo, n = 7). Defibrillation was attempted 10 mins after drug administration. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Compared with saline placebo treated-animals, coronary perfusion pressure in vasopressin-treated pigs was significantly higher 90 secs (36 +/- 5 mm Hg vs. 7 +/- 4 mm Hg, p =.000) to 10 mins (24 +/- 4 mm Hg vs. 8 +/- 4 mm Hg, p =.000) after drug administration. Restoration of spontaneous circulation and 1 hr survival were significantly higher in vasopressin animals compared with saline placebo (8 of 8 vasopressinpigs vs. 0 of 7 placebo pigs, p <.001). CONCLUSIONS: A single 0.4-unit/kg dose of vasopressin administered at a body core temperature <30 degrees C significantly improved defibrillation success and 1-hr survival in a pig model of hypothermic cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Authors: J Dave Barry; Dave Durkovich; Lee Cantrell; William Richardson; Tri Tong; Steve Offerman; Richard F Clark; David A Tanen; Saralyn Williams Journal: J Med Toxicol Date: 2005-12
Authors: Peter Paal; Les Gordon; Giacomo Strapazzon; Monika Brodmann Maeder; Gabriel Putzer; Beat Walpoth; Michael Wanscher; Doug Brown; Michael Holzer; Gregor Broessner; Hermann Brugger Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Jan Harald Nilsen; Sergei Valkov; Rizwan Mohyuddin; Torstein Schanche; Timofei V Kondratiev; Torvind Naesheim; Gary C Sieck; Torkjel Tveita Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 4.566