Literature DB >> 12072148

Comparing clinical risk assessments using operationalized criteria.

C S H Brown1, K R Lloyd.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical risk assessment of patients by psychiatrists working in different mental health service settings (low, medium and high security).
METHOD: Operationalized criteria of clinical factors recognized as indicating risk of harm to others were developed into a simple checklist with explicit item descriptions and definitions (OP-RISK). This was used to compare risk assessments in a prospective cohort of 161 consecutive referrals to a high secure psychiatric hospital.
RESULTS: Agreement on the risk posed by a patient between psychiatrists working outside and inside high secure services using unstructured clinical risk assessment was poor (kappa=-0.006). When OP-RISK was applied to the clinical risk assessments, agreement improved (kappa=0.742).
CONCLUSION: Applying operationalized criteria to clinical risk assessment is useful in integrating different mental health service settings. The use of OP-RISK may facilitate the referral process to tertiary care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12072148     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.106.s412.32.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl        ISSN: 0065-1591


  2 in total

1.  The DUNDRUM-1 structured professional judgment for triage to appropriate levels of therapeutic security: retrospective-cohort validation study.

Authors:  Grainne Flynn; Conor O'Neill; Clare McInerney; Harry G Kennedy
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.630

2.  Accuracy of telepsychiatric assessment of new routine outpatient referrals.

Authors:  Surendra P Singh; Dinesh Arya; Trish Peters
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 3.630

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.