Literature DB >> 12071682

Protection for the good: subcategorization reduces hedonic contrast.

Debra A Zellner1, Brett B Kern, Scott Parker.   

Abstract

Stimuli are rated less "good" when compared to very good context stimuli than when presented alone or compared to less good context stimuli. This diminution in rating is hedonic contrast. In two studies, degree of hedonic contrast depended on subjects' categorization of stimuli. Subjects were surveyed about their liking of gourmet and ordinary coffees (Study 1) and specialty and regular beers (Study 2). In Study 1, contrast was substantially smaller for subjects who regarded the coffees as belonging to different categories than for subjects having a common category for both sorts of coffees. The analogous phenomenon was found in Study 2, comparing subjects who subcategorized beers to subjects who had a common category for both sorts of beers. Contrast is greatest for stimuli in a common category. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12071682     DOI: 10.1006/appe.2002.0476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  3 in total

1.  Compared to what? Effects of categorization on hedonic contrast.

Authors:  Debra A Zellner; Elizabeth A Rohm; Terri L Bassetti; Scott Parker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

2.  The categorization effect in hedonic contrast: experts differ from novices.

Authors:  Lauren M Rota; Debra A Zellner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

3.  Environmental Aesthetic Value Influences the Intention for Moral Behavior: Changes in Behavioral Moral Judgment.

Authors:  Chenjing Wu; Xianyou He
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.