Literature DB >> 12070396

Comparison of two skin care regimes for incontinence.

P Cooper1, D Gray.   

Abstract

It is estimated that 30% of nursing home residents may be faecally incontinent, with those figures rising to 60% for patients in long-stay hospitals (Royal College of Physicians, 1995). Maintaining skin integrity for these patients can be complex. With little clinical information to support carers, choosing a skin care regime that maintains skin integrity for this high-risk group can be difficult. This study aims to compare two recognized skin care regimes, used in the cleansing of patients' skin following an episode of incontinence, and their impact on patients' skin integrity. A total of 93 patients were recruited to the trial from five care of the elderly or dependent service providers. The subjects were randomly allocated to either group A (soap and water; n = 49), or group B (Clinisan (Vernacare); n = 44). Initially, 33 patients in both groups started with healthy skin. However, the results of the final assessment identified only 17 subjects in group A remaining healthy, compared with 27 in group B.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12070396     DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2001.10.Sup1.5346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nurs        ISSN: 0966-0461


  8 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical devices for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Allyson Lipp; Christine Shaw; Karin Glavind
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-17

2.  Pressure ulcer prevention: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-04-01

Review 3.  Interventions for preventing and treating incontinence-associated dermatitis in adults.

Authors:  Dimitri Beeckman; Nele Van Damme; Lisette Schoonhoven; Aurélie Van Lancker; Jan Kottner; Hilde Beele; Mikel Gray; Sue Woodward; Mandy Fader; Karen Van den Bussche; Ann Van Hecke; Dorien De Meyer; Sofie Verhaeghe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-10

4.  Efficacy of an improved absorbent pad on incontinence-associated dermatitis in older women: cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Junko Sugama; Hiromi Sanada; Yoshie Shigeta; Gojiro Nakagami; Chizuko Konya
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of Faecal Incontinence-A UEG/ESCP/ESNM/ESPCG collaboration.

Authors:  Sadé L Assmann; Daniel Keszthelyi; Jos Kleijnen; Foteini Anastasiou; Elissa Bradshaw; Ann E Brannigan; Emma V Carrington; Giuseppe Chiarioni; Liora D A Ebben; Marc A Gladman; Yasuko Maeda; Jarno Melenhorst; Giovanni Milito; Jean W M Muris; Julius Orhalmi; Daniel Pohl; Yvonne Tillotson; Mona Rydningen; Saulius Svagzdys; Carolynne J Vaizey; Stephanie O Breukink
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 6.866

Review 6.  Recommendations for managing cutaneous disorders associated with advancing age.

Authors:  Philippe Humbert; Brigitte Dréno; Jean Krutmann; Thomas Anton Luger; Raoul Triller; Sylvie Meaume; Sophie Seité
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.458

7.  Clinical Evaluation of a Skin Protectant for the Management of Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis: An Open-Label, Nonrandomized, Prospective Study.

Authors:  Mary R Brennan; Catherine T Milne; Marie Agrell-Kann; Bruce P Ekholm
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.741

Review 8.  Management of Moisture-Associated Skin Damage: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kevin Y Woo; Dimitri Beeckman; Debashish Chakravarthy
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.347

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.