Literature DB >> 12069508

Functional aspects of strepsirrhine lumbar vertebral bodies and spinous processes.

Liza J Shapiro1, Cornelia V M Simons.   

Abstract

The relationship between form and function in the lumbar vertebral column has been well documented among platyrrhines and especially catarrhines, while functional studies of postcranial morphology among strepsirrhines have concentrated predominantly on the limbs. This morphometric study investigates biomechanically relevant attributes of the lumbar vertebral morphology of 20 species of extant strepsirrhines. With this extensive sample, our goal is to address the influence of positional behavior on lumbar vertebral form while also assessing the effects of body size and phylogenetic history. The results reveal distinctions in lumbar vertebral morphology among strepsirrhines in functional association with their habitual postures and primary locomotor behaviors. In general, strepsirrhines that emphasize pronograde posture and quadrupedal locomotion combined with leaping (from a pronograde position) have the relatively longest lumbar regions and lumbar vertebral bodies, features promoting sagittal spinal flexibility. Indrids and galagonids that rely primarily on vertical clinging and leaping with orthograde posture share a relatively short (i.e., stable and resistant to bending) lumbar region, although the length of individual lumbar vertebral bodies varies phylogenetically and possibly allometrically. The other two vertical clingers and leapers, Hapalemur and Lepilemur, more closely resemble the pronograde, quadrupedal taxa. The specialized, suspensory lorids have relatively short lumbar regions as well, but the lengths of their lumbar regions are influenced by body size, and Arctocebus has dramatically longer vertebral bodies than do the other lorids. Lumbar morphology among galagonids appears to reflect a strong phylogenetic signal superimposed on a functional one. In general, relative length of the spinous processes follows a positively allometric trend, although lorids (especially the larger-bodied forms) have relatively short spinous processes for their body size, in accordance with their positional repertoire. The results of the study broaden our understanding of postcranial adaptation in primates, while providing an extensive comparative database for interpreting vertebral morphology in fossil primates. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12069508     DOI: 10.1006/jhev.2002.0560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  6 in total

1.  Scaling of lumbar vertebrae in anthropoids and implications for evolution of the hominoid axial skeleton.

Authors:  Masato Nakatsukasa; Youichi Hirose
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  Intraspecific male combat behaviour predicts morphology of cervical vertebrae in ruminant mammals.

Authors:  Abby Vander Linden; Elizabeth R Dumont
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Epaxial muscle fiber architecture favors enhanced excursion and power in the leaper Galago senegalensis.

Authors:  Emranul Huq; Christine E Wall; Andrea B Taylor
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  3D shape analyses of extant primate and fossil hominin vertebrae support the ancestral shape hypothesis for intervertebral disc herniation.

Authors:  Kimberly A Plomp; Keith Dobney; Darlene A Weston; Una Strand Viðarsdóttir; Mark Collard
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Early amphibians evolved distinct vertebrae for habitat invasions.

Authors:  Aja Mia Carter; S Tonia Hsieh; Peter Dodson; Lauren Sallan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Adaptation and constraint in the evolution of the mammalian backbone.

Authors:  Katrina E Jones; Lorena Benitez; Kenneth D Angielczyk; Stephanie E Pierce
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.260

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.