Analysis methods of polysorbate 20: A new method to assess the stability of polysorbate 20 and established methods that may overlook degraded polysorbate 20.

PURPOSE: Polysorbate 20 is a commonly used excipient in biopharmaceutical formulations, some of which may have an enzymatic activity. The action(s) of polysorbate 20 in biopharmaceutical formulations as a stabilizer require this surfactant to maintain its intact structure. This manuscript evaluates a new analytic method for the analysis of polysorbate 20 degradation in the format of a biopharmaceutical formulation and makes a comparison with several established methods of analysis.
METHODS: Polysorbate 20 samples were degraded in a controlled environment utilizing the enzyme pancreatic lipase to generate degradants that included lauric acid and the sorbitan polyoxyethylene side chain. A new method was developed with sufficient sensitivity to analyze the degraded solutions. Lauric acid was derivatized with the fluorescent reagent 9-anthryldiazomethane to form 9-anthrylmethylethyl ester. The derivatized lauric acid was separated by reversed-phase chromatography and detected by fluorescence or UV spectroscopy. Three established methods utilized to measure polysorbate 20 were evaluated for their ability to detect degraded polysorbate 20. These methods were: (1) fluorescence analysis with N-phenyl-1-naphthylamine fluorescent dye; (2) UV spectroscopy with ammonium cobaltothiocyanate colorimetric reagent; and (3) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).
RESULTS: Polysorbate 20 incubation with lipase resulted in degraded polysorbate 20 as determined by the derivatized lauric acid assay. The UV spectroscopy assay utilizing ammonium cobaltothiocyanate reagent was not able to detect the degradation of polysorbate 20 in the samples. The fluorescence method of analysis detected polysorbate 20 degradation as an approximate 50% decrease in micelles in comparison to standard nondegraded polysorbate 20 solutions. NMR analysis resulted in similar proton peak areas for both degraded and nondegraded polysorbate 20 samples. NMR spectra did contain minor differences between the samples.
CONCLUSIONS: It is essential to choose the appropriate method of polysorbate 20 evaluation to assess the content, stability, and compatibility of a formulation. Current established methods to assess polysorbate 20 may overlook and do not necessarily monitor the potential degradation of this surfactant, which results in the formation of lauric acid. Because this type of degradation may occur in a formulation by an enzymatically active biopharmaceutical, a new method of analysis has been established.