Literature DB >> 12069085

Using voxel-dependent importance factors for interactive DVH-based dose optimization.

Cristian Cotrutz1, Lei Xing.   

Abstract

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) inverse planning is usually performed by pre-selecting parameters such as beam modality, beam configuration and importance factors and then optimizing the fluence profiles or beamlet weights. In reality, the IMRT dose optimization problem may be ill-conditioned and there may not be a physical solution to account for the chosen parameters and constraints. Planner intervention is often required to conduct a multiple trial-and-error process where several parameters are sequentially varied until an acceptable compromise is achieved. The resulting solution reflects a balance between the conflicting requirements of the target and the sensitive structures. A major problem of the conventional inverse planning formalism is that there exists no effective mechanism for a planner to fine-tune the dose distribution on a local level or to differentially modify the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the involved structures. In this paper we introduce a new inverse planning scheme with voxel-dependent importance factors and demonstrate that it provides us with an effective link between the system parameters and the dosimetric behaviour at a local level. The planning proceeds in two steps. After a conventional trial-and-error inverse planning procedure is completed, we identify the dose interval at which the fractional volume on the DVH curve needs to be changed. The voxels that receive dose in the selected range are then located and their voxel-dependent importance factors are adjusted accordingly. The fine-tuning of the DVHs is iterative in nature and, using widely available computer graphic software tools, the process can be made graphically interactive. The new IMRT planning scheme is applied to two test cases and the results indicate that our control over the differential shapes of the DVHs of the involved structures is,greatly enhanced. Thus the technique may have significant practical implications in facilitating the IMRT treatment planning process.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12069085     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/10/304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  9 in total

1.  Toward truly optimal IMRT dose distribution: inverse planning with voxel-specific penalty.

Authors:  Pavel Lougovski; Jordan LeNoach; Lei Zhu; Yunzhi Ma; Yair Censor; Lei Xing
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-12

2.  [Constraint priority list-based multi-objective optimization for intensity-modulated radiation therapy].

Authors:  Yan-Hua Mai; Fan-Tu Kong; Yi-Wei Yang; Yong-Bao Li; Ting Song; Ling-Hong Zhou
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-06-20

3.  Inverse 4D conformal planning for lung SBRT using particle swarm optimization.

Authors:  A Modiri; X Gu; A Hagan; R Bland; P Iyengar; R Timmerman; A Sawant
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Radiotherapy Planning Using an Improved Search Strategy in Particle Swarm Optimization.

Authors:  Arezoo Modiri; Xuejun Gu; Aaron M Hagan; Amit Sawant
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Voxel-based automatic multi-criteria optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Yanhua Mai; Fantu Kong; Yiwei Yang; Linghong Zhou; Yongbao Li; Ting Song
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Hybrid optimization based on non-coplanar needles for brachytherapy dose planning.

Authors:  Xiaodong Ma; Zhiyong Yang; Shan Jiang; Guobin Zhang; Bin Huo; Shude Chai
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2019-06-28

7.  An Automated Treatment Plan Quality Control Tool for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Using a Voxel-Weighting Factor-Based Re-Optimization Algorithm.

Authors:  Ting Song; Nan Li; Masoud Zarepisheh; Yongbao Li; Quentin Gautier; Linghong Zhou; Loren Mell; Steve Jiang; Laura Cerviño
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Interactive dose shaping part 1: a new paradigm for IMRT treatment planning.

Authors:  Peter Ziegenhein; Cornelis Ph Kamerling; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Physically constrained voxel-based penalty adaptation for ultra-fast IMRT planning.

Authors:  Niklas Wahl; Mark Bangert; Cornelis P Kamerling; Peter Ziegenhein; Gijsbert H Bol; Bas W Raaymakers; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.