Literature DB >> 12068189

Microsatellite instability as a marker in predicting metachronous multiple colorectal carcinomas after surgery: a cohort-like study.

Kazuhisa Shitoh1, Fumio Konishi, Yasuyuki Miyakura, Kazutomo Togashi, Tomomi Okamoto, Hideo Nagai.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In case-control studies, it was reported that microsatellite instability might be helpful in predicting the development of metachronous multiple colorectal cancers. The purpose of this cohort-like study was to determine whether microsatellite instability is a novel independent marker in predicting metachronous colorectal carcinomas after colorectal cancer surgery.
METHODS: Three hundred twenty-eight colorectal carcinoma patients were surveyed by periodic colonoscopy for at least three years after surgery. Among these, DNA from paraffin-embedded sections was available for 272 cases. DNA of these cases was studied for six microsatellite markers (five dinucleotide repeats, one mononucleotide repeat). Microsatellite instability phenotype was defined as alterations in one or more loci.
RESULTS: Median follow-up period was 74 months, and the median number of colonoscopies was 4.6. The percentage of microsatellite instability-positive cases was 26.4 percent (72/272). Seventeen metachronous colorectal carcinomas were detected during the follow-up period. Incidences of metachronous colorectal carcinomas in microsatellite instability-positive and microsatellite instability-negative cases were 15.3 and 3 percent, respectively (P < 0.001). The cumulative five-year incidence of metachronous colorectal carcinomas was significantly higher in microsatellite instability-positive cases than in microsatellite instability-negative cases (12.5 vs. 2.5 percent, P < 0.0001). Logistic regression analysis of the relationship between incidence of metachronous colorectal carcinomas and possible risk factors (namely, coexistence of adenoma at the time of surgery, family history of colorectal carcinoma, history of extracolonic malignancy, and microsatellite instability status) showed that microsatellite instability and coexistence of adenoma were significant independent risk factors for the occurrence of metachronous colorectal carcinomas, with values of P = 0.001 and 0.02, respectively.
CONCLUSION: These data indicate that microsatellite instability can be regarded as a novel independent and important marker for predicting the development of metachronous colorectal carcinoma after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12068189     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6177-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  9 in total

1.  High-frequency microsatellite instability and BRAF mutation (V600E) in unselected Serbian patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Srdjan Markovic; Jadranka Antic; Neda Dragicevic; Richard Hamelin; Zoran Krivokapic
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.611

2.  Geno- and pheno-typic characterization in ten patients with double-primary gastric and colorectal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Jin C Kim; Kum H Koo; Hee C Kim; Jung S Kim; Gyeong H Kang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of multiple primary colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hong-Zhi Wang; Xin-Fu Huang; Yi Wang; Jia-Fu Ji; Jin Gu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The Experience of Extended Bowel Resection in Individuals With a High Metachronous Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Emma J Steel; Alison H Trainer; Alexander G Heriot; Craig Lynch; Susan Parry; Aung K Win; Louise A Keogh
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Clinicopathological features of sporadic MSI colorectal cancer and Lynch syndrome: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yujiro Nakayama; Takeru Iijima; Takuhiko Inokuchi; Ekumi Kojika; Misato Takao; Akinari Takao; Koichi Koizumi; Shin-Ichiro Horiguchi; Tsunekazu Hishima; Tatsuro Yamaguchi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers: Where Are We Now?

Authors:  Maria Gonzalez-Pons; Marcia Cruz-Correa
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Microsatellite instability & survival in patients with stage II/III colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Markovic Srdjan; Antic Jadranka; Dimitrijevic Ivan; Zogovic Branimir; Bojic Daniela; Svorcan Petar; Markovic Velimir; Krivokapic Zoran
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Microsatellite instability is inversely associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yujiro Nakayama; Takeru Iijima; Rika Wakaume; Keiichi Takahashi; Hiroshi Matsumoto; Daisuke Nakano; Michiko Miyaki; Tatsuro Yamaguchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Rates of metachronous adenoma after curative resection for left-sided or right-sided colon cancer.

Authors:  Yuk Fai Lam; Wai Kay Seto; Teresa Tong; Ka Shing Cheung; Oswens Lo; Ivan Fn Hung; Wai Lun Law; Wai K Leung
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2018-10-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.