Literature DB >> 12068163

Iron-oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaques: postmortem analysis of accuracy, inter-observer agreement, and pitfalls.

S A Schmitz1, M Taupitz, S Wagner, S E Coupland, R Gust, A Nikolova, K J Wolf.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging using ultra small superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) particles is a new noninvasive modality for imaging inflammatory atherosclerotic plaques. We determined the accuracy, interobserver agreement, and potential sources of error of this technique by means of postmortem MR imaging of aortic preparations.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Anesthetized atherosclerotic Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic (WHHL) rabbits were studied after administration of different dosages of intravenous USPIO (DDM 43/34, IDF Berlin, Germany) and different postcontrast time intervals. A (n = 5) received 0 micromol Fe/kg. B (n = 5) received 50 micromol Fe/kg, 8-hour postcontrast interval. C (n = 5) received 50 micromol, 24 hours. D received 200 micromol, 48 hours. The aortas were removed and 3-mm segments prepared for postmortem examination by MR imaging using a T2-weighted gradient-echo sequence (TR/TE/FA; 41 milliseconds/11 milliseconds/15 degrees ), radiography (mammography), and histology (iron staining). USPIO accumulation was defined as the presence of 20 iron-positive cells per microscopic view (x100 magnification). Two independent readers analyzed the MR images and rated their confidence level for a positive MRI finding, defined as a focal signal loss, on a 5-point scale. The results were evaluated by receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: Of a total of 621 vessel segments technically acceptable for evaluation, 534 were histologically negative and 87 positive. Accuracy, expressed as the area under the ROC curve, was 0.85 for reader 1 and 0.88 for reader 2. Interobserver agreement was 0.67. False-positive findings were established by at least one reader for 121 of the 621 segments, false-negative findings for only 15 segments. Calcifications and mural thrombi were identified as potential sources of error of the method.
CONCLUSION: Postmortem USPIO-enhanced MR imaging of atherosclerotic plaques showed a high accuracy and good interobserver agreement in the animal model used here. Further optimization of the method should aim at reducing the rather high percentage of false-positive results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12068163     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-200207000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  15 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of carotid artery disease: from luminology to function?

Authors:  J H Gillard
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Noninvasive detection of macrophage-rich atherosclerotic plaque in hyperlipidemic rabbits using "positive contrast" magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Grigorios Korosoglou; Robert G Weiss; Dorota A Kedziorek; Piotr Walczak; Wesley D Gilson; Michael Schär; David E Sosnovik; Dara L Kraitchman; Raymond C Boston; Jeff W M Bulte; Ralph Weissleder; Matthias Stuber
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Molecular imaging in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: current perspective and future potential.

Authors:  David E Sosnovik
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-02

Review 4.  Nanomedicine strategies for molecular targets with MRI and optical imaging.

Authors:  Dipanjan Pan; Shelton D Caruthers; Junjie Chen; Patrick M Winter; Angana SenPan; Anne H Schmieder; Samuel A Wickline; Gregory M Lanza
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.808

Review 5.  Imaging atherosclerosis and vulnerable plaque.

Authors:  Mehran M Sadeghi; David K Glover; Gregory M Lanza; Zahi A Fayad; Lynne L Johnson
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Combined non-invasive assessment of endothelial shear stress and molecular imaging of inflammation for the prediction of inflamed plaque in hyperlipidaemic rabbit aortas.

Authors:  Gitsios Gitsioudis; Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Peter Wolf; Anna Missiou; Antonios P Antoniadis; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Sönke Bartling; Zeynep Arica; Matthias Stuber; Frank J Rybicki; Max Nunninger; Christian Erbel; Peter Libby; George D Giannoglou; Hugo A Katus; Grigorios Korosoglou
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 7.  Nanoparticles as magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents for vascular and cardiac diseases.

Authors:  Wei Chen; David P Cormode; Zahi A Fayad; Willem J M Mulder
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2010-10-21

8.  Development of contrast agents targeted to macrophage scavenger receptors for MRI of vascular inflammation.

Authors:  Björn Gustafsson; Susan Youens; Angelique Y Louie
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.774

Review 9.  Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance for molecular imaging.

Authors:  Patrick M Winter; Shelton D Caruthers; Gregory M Lanza; Samuel A Wickline
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Intravascular near-infrared fluorescence molecular imaging of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Arun K Thukkani; Farouc A Jaffer
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.