Literature DB >> 12068100

Signals involved in Arabidopsis resistance to Trichoplusia ni caterpillars induced by virulent and avirulent strains of the phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

Jianping Cui1, Georg Jander, Lisa R Racki, Paul D Kim, Naomi E Pierce, Frederick M Ausubel.   

Abstract

Plants have evolved different but interconnected strategies to defend themselves against herbivorous insects and microbial pathogens. We used an Arabidopsis/Pseudomonas syringae pathosystem to investigate the impact of pathogen-induced defense responses on cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni) larval feeding. Arabidopsis mutants [npr1, pad4, eds5, and sid2(eds16)] or transgenic plants (nahG) that are more susceptible to microbial pathogens and are compromised in salicylic acid (SA)-dependent defense responses exhibited reduced levels of feeding by T. ni compared with wild-type plants. Consistent with these results, Arabidopsis mutants that are more resistant to microbial pathogens and have elevated levels of SA (cpr1 and cpr6) exhibited enhanced levels of T. ni feeding. These experiments suggested an inverse relationship between an active SA defense pathway and insect feeding. In contrast to these results, there was increased resistance to T. ni in wild-type Arabidopsis ecotype Columbia plants that were infected with P. syringae pv. maculicola strain ES4326 (Psm ES4326) expressing the avirulence genes avrRpt2 or avrB, which elicit a hypersensitive response, high levels of SA accumulation, and systemic acquired resistance to bacterial infection. Similar results were obtained with other ecotypes, including Landsberg erecta, Cape Verdi Islands, and Shakdara. When infected with Psm ES4326(avrRpt2) or Psm ES4326(avrB), nahG transgenic and npr1 mutant plants (which are more susceptible to virulent and avirulent P. syringae strains) failed to show the increased insect resistance exhibited by wild-type plants. It was surprising that wild-type plants, as well as nahG and npr1 plants, infected with Psm ES4326 not expressing avrRpt2 or avrB, which elicits disease, became more susceptible to T. ni. Our results suggest two potentially novel systemic signaling pathways: a systemic response elicited by HR that leads to enhanced T. ni resistance and overrides the SA-mediated increase in T. ni susceptibility, and a SA-independent systemic response induced by virulent pathogens that leads to enhanced susceptibility to T. ni.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12068100      PMCID: PMC161673          DOI: 10.1104/pp.010815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  86 in total

1.  Mutational analysis of the Arabidopsis nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeat resistance gene RPS2.

Authors:  Y Tao; F Yuan; R T Leister; F M Ausubel; F Katagiri
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Coordinated plant defense responses in Arabidopsis revealed by microarray analysis.

Authors:  P M Schenk; K Kazan; I Wilson; J P Anderson; T Richmond; S C Somerville; J M Manners
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The promoter of the plant defensin gene PDF1.2 from Arabidopsis is systemically activated by fungal pathogens and responds to methyl jasmonate but not to salicylic acid.

Authors:  J M Manners; I A Penninckx; K Vermaere; K Kazan; R L Brown; A Morgan; D J Maclean; M D Curtis; B P Cammue; W F Broekaert
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.076

4.  Arabidopsis enhanced disease susceptibility mutants exhibit enhanced susceptibility to several bacterial pathogens and alterations in PR-1 gene expression.

Authors:  E E Rogers; F M Ausubel
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Salicylic acid induction-deficient mutants of Arabidopsis express PR-2 and PR-5 and accumulate high levels of camalexin after pathogen inoculation.

Authors:  C Nawrath; J P Métraux
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 6.  Use of Arabidopsis for genetic dissection of plant defense responses.

Authors:  J Glazebrook; E E Rogers; F M Ausubel
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 16.830

7.  Characterization of a salicylic acid-insensitive mutant (sai1) of Arabidopsis thaliana, identified in a selective screen utilizing the SA-inducible expression of the tms2 gene.

Authors:  J Shah; F Tsui; D F Klessig
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.171

8.  Induced plant defense responses against chewing insects. Ethylene signaling reduces resistance of Arabidopsis against Egyptian cotton worm but not diamondback moth.

Authors:  H U Stotz; B R Pittendrigh; J Kroymann; K Weniger; J Fritsche; A Bauke; T Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  The gain-of-function Arabidopsis acd6 mutant reveals novel regulation and function of the salicylic acid signaling pathway in controlling cell death, defenses, and cell growth.

Authors:  D N Rate; J V Cuenca; G R Bowman; D S Guttman; J T Greenberg
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 11.277

10.  Concomitant activation of jasmonate and ethylene response pathways is required for induction of a plant defensin gene in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  I A Penninckx; B P Thomma; A Buchala; J P Métraux; W F Broekaert
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.277

View more
  38 in total

1.  Arabidopsis-insect interactions.

Authors:  Remco M P Van Poecke
Journal:  Arabidopsis Book       Date:  2007-02-21

2.  The pepper oxidoreductase CaOXR1 interacts with the transcription factor CaRAV1 and is required for salt and osmotic stress tolerance.

Authors:  Sung Chul Lee; Du Seok Choi; In Sun Hwang; Byung Kook Hwang
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Mining the plant-herbivore interface with a leafmining Drosophila of Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Noah K Whiteman; Simon C Groen; Daniela Chevasco; Ashley Bear; Noor Beckwith; T Ryan Gregory; Carine Denoux; Nicole Mammarella; Frederick M Ausubel; Naomi E Pierce
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Compatible and incompatible Xanthomonas infections differentially affect herbivore-induced volatile emission by pepper plants.

Authors:  Yasmin J Cardoza; James H Tumlinson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Virus strains differentially induce plant susceptibility to aphid vectors and chewing herbivores.

Authors:  Mônica F Kersch-Becker; Jennifer S Thaler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Considerations on post-translational modification and protein targeting in the Arabidopsis defense proteome.

Authors:  Alexandra Me Jones; John Mansfield; Murray Grant
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2007-05

7.  Ethylene modulates the role of NONEXPRESSOR OF PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENES1 in cross talk between salicylate and jasmonate signaling.

Authors:  Antonio Leon-Reyes; Steven H Spoel; Elvira S De Lange; Hiroshi Abe; Masatomo Kobayashi; Shinya Tsuda; Frank F Millenaar; Rob A M Welschen; Tita Ritsema; Corné M J Pieterse
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Regulation of tradeoffs between plant defenses against pathogens with different lifestyles.

Authors:  Steven H Spoel; Jessica S Johnson; Xinnian Dong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Pathogen-triggered ethylene signaling mediates systemic-induced susceptibility to herbivory in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Simon C Groen; Noah K Whiteman; Adam K Bahrami; Amity M Wilczek; Jianping Cui; Jacob A Russell; Angelica Cibrian-Jaramillo; Ian A Butler; Jignasha D Rana; Guo-Hua Huang; Jenifer Bush; Frederick M Ausubel; Naomi E Pierce
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 11.277

10.  Interactive effects of jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, and gibberellin on induction of trichomes in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  M Brian Traw; Joy Bergelson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.