Literature DB >> 12067991

Identification of unstable sequences within the common fragile site at 3p14.2: implications for the mechanism of deletions within fragile histidine triad gene/common fragile site at 3p14.2 in tumors.

Shantel Corbin1, Mary E Neilly, Rafael Espinosa, Elizabeth M Davis, Timothy W McKeithan, Michelle M Le Beau.   

Abstract

The FRA3B, at 3p14.2, lies within the fragile histidine triad (FHIT) gene and is the most highly expressed of the common fragile sites observed when DNA replication is perturbed by aphidicolin. Common fragile sites are highly unstable regions of the genome. Large intragenic deletions within FHIT, localized within the FRA3B sequences, have been identified in a variety of tumor cells. To characterize the FRA3B deletions in tumor cells and identify FRA3B sequences that are required for fragile site induction, we used microcell-mediated chromosome transfer to isolate hybrid cell clones that retain chromosome 3 homologues with various deletions within FRA3B. Detailed molecular mapping of the FHIT/FRA3B locus in the resultant hybrid cells revealed a complex pattern of instability within FRA3B. Each tumor cell line contained multiple chromosome 3 homologues with variable deletion patterns, often with discontinuous deletions, suggesting that the process of breakage and repair within FRA3B is an ongoing one. By comparing the approximate location of the breakpoints in the hybrid clones, we identified 11 recurring breakpoint/repair regions within the FRA3B. A comparison of the frequency of breaks/gaps within FRA3B in the hybrid clones with various deletions of FRA3B sequences revealed that the loss of FRA3B sequences does not reduce the overall rate of breakage and instability within the remaining FRA3B sequences. The majority of breaks occurred in the proximal portion of the FRA3B, in a 300-kb interval between exon 4 and the proximal 50 kb of intron 5. Our observations suggest that there is no single sequence within the FRA3B that influences breakage or recombination within this region; however, we cannot rule out the presence of multiple "hot spots" within the FHIT/FRA3B locus. Together, the results suggest that factors other than the DNA sequence per se are responsible for the formation of DNA breaks/gaps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12067991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  23 in total

1.  DNA fragile site breakage as a measure of chemical exposure and predictor of individual susceptibility to form oncogenic rearrangements.

Authors:  Christine E Lehman; Laura W Dillon; Yuri E Nikiforov; Yuh-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Role of DNA secondary structures in fragile site breakage along human chromosome 10.

Authors:  Laura W Dillon; Levi C T Pierce; Maggie C Y Ng; Yuh-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Reduced Fhit protein expression in nickel-transformed mouse cells and in nickel-induced murine sarcomas.

Authors:  Renata Kowara; Konstantin Salnikow; Bhalchandra A Diwan; Robert M Bare; Michael P Waalkes; Kazimierz S Kasprzak
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.396

4.  Aberrant crypt focus and fragile histidine triad protein in sporadic colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Kim Vaiphei; Aruna Rangan; Rajinder Singh
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-12-15

5.  Replication stress induces tumor-like microdeletions in FHIT/FRA3B.

Authors:  Sandra G Durkin; Ryan L Ragland; Martin F Arlt; Jennifer G Mulle; Stephen T Warren; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Two breakpoint clusters at fragile site FRA3B form phased nucleosomes.

Authors:  David J Mulvihill; Yuh-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  ATR preferentially interacts with common fragile site FRA3B and the binding requires its kinase activity in response to aphidicolin treatment.

Authors:  Cheng Wan; Atul Kulkarni; Yuh-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  The role of DNA damage response pathways in chromosome fragility in Fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Daman Kumari; Valentina Somma; Asako J Nakamura; William M Bonner; Ettoré D'Ambrosio; Karen Usdin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  DNA breaks at fragile sites generate oncogenic RET/PTC rearrangements in human thyroid cells.

Authors:  M Gandhi; L W Dillon; S Pramanik; Y E Nikiforov; Y-H Wang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  DNA structure and the Werner protein modulate human DNA polymerase delta-dependent replication dynamics within the common fragile site FRA16D.

Authors:  Sandeep N Shah; Patricia L Opresko; Xiao Meng; Marietta Y W T Lee; Kristin A Eckert
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.