Sigurd Fasting1, Sven E Gisvold. 1. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, St. Olav's Hospital, University Hospital of Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway. sigurd.fasting@medisin.ntnu.no
Abstract
PURPOSE: The low incidence of mortality and major morbidity in anesthesia makes it difficult to study the pattern of potential accidents and to develop preventive strategies. Anesthetic 'near-misses', however, occur more frequently. Using data from a simple routine-based system of problem reporting, we have analyzed the pattern and causes of serious non-fatal problems, in order to improve preventive strategies. METHODS: We prospectively recorded anesthesia-related information from all anesthetics for five years. The data included intraoperative problems, which were graded into four levels, according to severity. We analyzed only the serious nonfatal problems, which were sorted according to clinical presentation, and also according to which factor was most important in the development of the problem. We assessed any untoward consequences for the patient, and whether the problems could have been prevented. RESULTS: Serious problems were recorded in 315 cases out of 83,844 (0.4%). Anesthesia was considered the major contributing factor in 111 cases. Difficult intubation, difficult emergence from general anesthesia, allergic reactions, arrhythmia and hypotension were the dominating problems. Twenty-six anesthesia related problems resulted in changes in level of postoperative care, and one patient later died in the intensive care unit after anaphylactic shock. Eighty-two problems could have been prevented by simple strategies. CONCLUSION: Analysis of serious nonfatal problems during anesthesia may contribute to improved preventive strategies. Data from a routine-based system are suitable for this type of analysis. Intubation, emergence, arrhythmia, hypotension and anaphylaxis cause most serious problems, and should be the object of preventive strategies.
PURPOSE: The low incidence of mortality and major morbidity in anesthesia makes it difficult to study the pattern of potential accidents and to develop preventive strategies. Anesthetic 'near-misses', however, occur more frequently. Using data from a simple routine-based system of problem reporting, we have analyzed the pattern and causes of serious non-fatal problems, in order to improve preventive strategies. METHODS: We prospectively recorded anesthesia-related information from all anesthetics for five years. The data included intraoperative problems, which were graded into four levels, according to severity. We analyzed only the serious nonfatal problems, which were sorted according to clinical presentation, and also according to which factor was most important in the development of the problem. We assessed any untoward consequences for the patient, and whether the problems could have been prevented. RESULTS: Serious problems were recorded in 315 cases out of 83,844 (0.4%). Anesthesia was considered the major contributing factor in 111 cases. Difficult intubation, difficult emergence from general anesthesia, allergic reactions, arrhythmia and hypotension were the dominating problems. Twenty-six anesthesia related problems resulted in changes in level of postoperative care, and one patient later died in the intensive care unit after anaphylactic shock. Eighty-two problems could have been prevented by simple strategies. CONCLUSION: Analysis of serious nonfatal problems during anesthesia may contribute to improved preventive strategies. Data from a routine-based system are suitable for this type of analysis. Intubation, emergence, arrhythmia, hypotension and anaphylaxis cause most serious problems, and should be the object of preventive strategies.
Authors: Ken Solt; Christa J Van Dort; Jessica J Chemali; Norman E Taylor; Jonathan D Kenny; Emery N Brown Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 7.892