Literature DB >> 12066710

Effect of nonindependent substitution on phylogenetic accuracy.

J P Huelsenbeck1, R Nielsen.   

Abstract

All current phylogenetic methods assume that DNA substitutions are independent among sites. However, ample empirical evidence suggests that the process of substitution is not independent but is, in fact, temporally and spatially correlated. The robustness of several commonly used phylogenetic methods to the assumption of independent substitution is examined. A compound Poisson process is used to model DNA substitution. This model assumes that substitution events are Poisson-distributed in time and that the number of substitutions associated with each event is geometrically distributed. The asymptotic properties of phylogenetic methods do not appear to change under a compound Poisson process of DNA substitution. Moreover, the rank order of the performance of different methods does not change. However, all phylogenetic methods become less efficient when substitution follows a compound Poisson process.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 12066710     DOI: 10.1080/106351599260319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  13 in total

1.  Analysis of European mtDNAs for recombination.

Authors:  J L Elson; R M Andrews; P F Chinnery; R N Lightowlers; D M Turnbull; N Howell
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-12-11       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sequence analysis reveals varying neutral substitution patterns in mammalian evolution.

Authors:  Dick G Hwang; Phil Green
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Diploid genome reconstruction of Ciona intestinalis and comparative analysis with Ciona savignyi.

Authors:  Jong Hyun Kim; Michael S Waterman; Lei M Li
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Evolutionary inference via the Poisson Indel Process.

Authors:  Alexandre Bouchard-Côté; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Quantifying the impact of dependent evolution among sites in phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  Chris A Nasrallah; David H Mathews; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Benefits of using molecular structure and abundance in phylogenomic analysis.

Authors:  Gustavo Caetano-Anollés; Arshan Nasir
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Decay of velvet worms (Onychophora), and bias in the fossil record of lobopodians.

Authors:  Duncan Je Murdock; Sarah E Gabbott; Georg Mayer; Mark A Purnell
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Giant viruses coexisted with the cellular ancestors and represent a distinct supergroup along with superkingdoms Archaea, Bacteria and Eukarya.

Authors:  Arshan Nasir; Kyung Mo Kim; Gustavo Caetano-Anolles
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Global patterns of protein domain gain and loss in superkingdoms.

Authors:  Arshan Nasir; Kyung Mo Kim; Gustavo Caetano-Anollés
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  The macroevolutionary consequences of phenotypic integration: from development to deep time.

Authors:  A Goswami; J B Smaers; C Soligo; P D Polly
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.