Literature DB >> 12066659

A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays.

M Thordrup1, F Isidor, P Hörsted-Bindslev.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the clinical performance of 4 types of tooth-colored inlays. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Fifteen direct ceramic inlays (Cerec Cos 2.0), 15 direct resin composite inlays (Brilliant Direct Inlay), 14 indirect ceramic inlays (Vita Dur N), and 14 indirect resin composite inlays (Estilux) were made in 37 patients, according to the manufacturers' instructions. The inlays were evaluated 1 week (baseline) and 6, 12, 36, 48, and 60 months after cementation (modified CDA Quality Evaluation System).
RESULTS: Two Vita Dur N inlays fractured after 1 and 4 years in function, and one Cerec inlay fractured after 4.5 years. Two Brilliant DI inlays needed replacement because of secondary caries (after 1 and 5 years), and one inlay (Estilux) needed replacement due to persisting hypersensitivity. Three inlays (1 Estilux and 2 Brilliant DI) were repaired due to chipping or minor fractures. During the observation period, the surface texture of Brilliant DI and Vita Dur N inlays became significantly rougher. After 5 years, the Estilux inlays had significantly lower ratings for morphology compared to baseline ratings. In general, the occlusal marginal adaptation did not show further disintegration of the luting cement after 1 year.
CONCLUSION: Eighty-eight percent of the inlays were in function after 5 years. No significant differences were revealed among the survival rates of the different types of inlays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12066659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quintessence Int        ISSN: 0033-6572            Impact factor:   1.677


  7 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of ceramic inlays.

Authors:  M Hayashi; N H F Wilson; C A Yeung; H V Worthington
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2002-12-21       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation.

Authors:  Ulla Pallesen; Vibeke Qvist
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-05-10       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Seven-year clinical performance of CEREC-2 all-ceramic CAD/CAM restorations placed within deeply destroyed teeth.

Authors:  Matthias J Roggendorf; Bianka Kunzi; Johannes Ebert; Hubert C Roggendorf; Roland Frankenberger; Sven M Reich
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro.

Authors:  Roland Frankenberger; Julia Hehn; Jan Hajtó; Norbert Krämer; Michael Naumann; Andreas Koch; Matthias J Roggendorf
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II CAD/CAM ceramic restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments.

Authors:  María José Sandoval; Giovanni Tommaso Rocca; Ivo Krejci; Michael Mandikos; Didier Dietschi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Marginal adaptation of indirect composite, glass-ceramic inlays and direct composite: an in vitro evaluation.

Authors:  S Zarrati; F Mahboub
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2010-06-30

7.  Three-year clinical performance of two indirect composite inlays compared to direct composite restorations.

Authors:  Nurcan Ozakar-Ilday; Yahya-Orcun Zorba; Mehmet Yildiz; Vildan Erdem; Nilgun Seven; Sezer Demirbuga
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-05-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.