Literature DB >> 12066103

Neonatal outcomes in immediate versus delayed conceptions after spontaneous abortion: a retrospective case series.

Rachel R Pruyn Goldstein1, Mary S Croughan, Patricia A Robertson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine differences in neonatal outcomes between successful pregnancies conceived immediately after a spontaneous abortion (SAB) and successful pregnancies conceived after two menstrual cycles or at least 100 days from the spontaneous abortion. STUDY
DESIGN: This study was a retrospective case series. Deliveries were identified from the University of California-San Francisco Perinatal Database among patients with a history of one SAB. Medical records of 268 patients were reviewed. Sixty-four patients fulfilled study criteria, with 19 in the immediate conception group and 45 in the delayed conception group. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi(2) tests and Fisher exact tests for variables with expected values of <5, whereas continuous variables were analyzed using Student t tests.
RESULTS: Neonatal outcomes for the 2 groups were similar, although neonates in the delayed conception group were more likely to have at least one of the following: low birth weight, an Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, or admission to the neonatal intensive care unit.
CONCLUSION: In this small retrospective case series, there was no evidence of adverse neonatal outcomes associated with conception immediately after a SAB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12066103     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.123741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  Interpregnancy interval after a miscarriage and obstetric outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy in a low-income setting, Nigeria: A cohort study.

Authors:  Lucky Osaheni Lawani; Joseph Tochukwu Enebe; Paul Eze; Francis Nwabueze Igboke; Chukwuemeka Ikeji Ukaegbe; Monica Omosivie Ugwu; Ujunwa Justina Agu; Enebe Nympha Onyinye; Chukwuemeka Anthony Iyoke
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2022-06-26

2.  Effect of interpregnancy interval on outcomes of pregnancy after miscarriage: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in Scotland.

Authors:  Eleanor R Love; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Norman C Smith; Sohinee Bhattacharya
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-08-05

3.  Trying to Conceive After an Early Pregnancy Loss: An Assessment on How Long Couples Should Wait.

Authors:  Karen C Schliep; Emily M Mitchell; Sunni L Mumford; Rose G Radin; Shvetha M Zarek; Lindsey Sjaarda; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with prior spontaneous or induced abortions.

Authors:  Michel A Makhlouf; Rebecca G Clifton; James M Roberts; Leslie Myatt; John C Hauth; Kenneth J Leveno; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Brian M Mercer; Alan M Peaceman; Susan M Ramin; Jay D Iams; Anthony Sciscione; Jorge E Tolosa; Yoram Sorokin
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Pregnancy intervals after stillbirth, neonatal death and spontaneous abortion and the risk of an adverse outcome in the next pregnancy in rural Bangladesh.

Authors:  Bareng A S Nonyane; Maureen Norton; Nazma Begum; Rasheduzzaman M Shah; Dipak K Mitra; Gary L Darmstadt; Abdullah H Baqui
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Pregnancy decisions after fetal or perinatal death: systematic review of qualitative research.

Authors:  Eleanor Dyer; Ruth Bell; Ruth Graham; Judith Rankin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  How long after a miscarriage should women wait before becoming pregnant again? Multivariate analysis of cohort data from Matlab, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Julie Davanzo; Lauren Hale; Mizanur Rahman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.