Literature DB >> 12066084

Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: a randomized trial of 3 techniques.

P Scott Barrilleaux1, James A Bofill, Dom A Terrone, Everett F Magann, Warren L May, John C Morrison.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of 3 different techniques of cervical ripening and induction. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients who required cervical ripening and induction were randomized to one of 3 groups: (1) supracervical Foley catheter and intravaginal dinoprostone gel, (2) supracervical Foley catheter and 100 microg oral doses of misoprostol, or (3) serial 100-microg oral doses of misoprostol. Intravenous oxytocin was administered when a protraction disorder of labor was identified.
RESULTS: There were 339 women randomized. There was no significant difference in the time from first intervention to delivery in the 3 groups (P =.546). In each group, a similar percentage of women required oxytocin (P =.103). The rates of cesarean delivery were equivalent among the groups (P =.722). Rates of tachysystole were high but statistically equivalent among the 3 groups. There were no significant differences in Apgar scores or umbilical artery pH.
CONCLUSION: Oral 100 microg serial doses of misoprostol, with or without the use of a supracervical Foley catheter, were equivalent to the use of a supracervical Foley catheter and serial 4-mg doses of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12066084     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.123821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Mechanical and Pharmacologic Methods of Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Lisa D Levine; Katheryne L Downes; Michal A Elovitz; Samuel Parry; Mary D Sammel; Sindhu K Srinivas
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 versus E2: a comparison of outcomes.

Authors:  Hector Mendez-Figueroa; Matthew J Bicocca; Megha Gupta; Stephen M Wagner; Suneet P Chauhan
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chris Wilkinson; Pamela Adelson; Deborah Turnbull
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 4.  Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

Authors:  Marieke Dt de Vaan; Mieke Lg Ten Eikelder; Marta Jozwiak; Kirsten R Palmer; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp; Ben Willem J Mol; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-18

5.  Comparison of vaginal misoprostol with foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor.

Authors:  Fatemeh Vahid Roudsari; Sedigheh Ayati; Marzieh Ghasemi; Maliheh Hasanzadeh Mofrad; Mohamad Taghi Shakeri; Farnoush Farshidi; Masoud Shahabian
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.696

6.  A randomized controlled trial of foley catheter, extra-amniotic saline infusion and prostaglandin e2 suppository for labor induction.

Authors:  Mandana Mansour Ghanaie; Mina Jafarabadi; Forozan Milani; Seyed Alaedin Asgary; Morteza Fallah Karkan
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2013-06

7.  Sublingual Misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening in women with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension: A randomized control trial.

Authors:  Sedigheh Ayati; Elahe Hasanzadeh; Leila Pourali; Mohammadtaghi Shakeri; Atiye Vatanchi
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2019-07-31

8.  Comparison of Dinoprostone and Oxytocin for the Induction of Labor in Late-Term Pregnancy and the Rate of Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Study in Ten Centers in South China.

Authors:  Yanxing Wei; Xueyuan Li; Yinhui Zhang; Yuewen Guo; Baomin Yin; Dunjin Chen; Yi Chen; Yanping Yu; Bin Zhu; Yiwei Qin; Jianping Zhang; Zhijian Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-11-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.