PURPOSE:Docetaxel and capecitabine, a tumor-activated oral fluoropyrimidine, show high single-agent efficacy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and synergy in preclinical studies. This international phase III trial compared efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine/docetaxel therapy with single-agent docetaxel in anthracycline-pretreated patients with MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to 21-day cycles of oral capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1 to 14 plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 (n = 255) or to docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 (n = 256). RESULTS:Capecitabine/docetaxel resulted in significantly superior efficacy in time to disease progression (TTP) (hazard ratio, 0.652; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.545 to 0.780; P =.0001; median, 6.1 v 4.2 months), overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.775; 95% CI, 0.634 to 0.947; P =.0126; median, 14.5 v 11.5 months), and objective tumor response rate (42% v 30%, P =.006) compared with docetaxel. Gastrointestinal side effects and hand-foot syndrome were more common with combination therapy, whereas myalgia, arthralgia, and neutropenic fever/sepsis were more common with single-agent docetaxel. More grade 3 adverse events occurred with combination therapy (71% v 49%, respectively), whereas grade 4 events were slightly more common with docetaxel (31% v 25% with combination). CONCLUSION: The significantly superior TTP and survival achieved with the addition of capecitabine to docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), with the manageable toxicity profile, indicate that this combination provides clear benefits over single-agent docetaxel 100 mg/m(2). Docetaxel/capecitabine therapy is an important treatment option for women with anthracycline-pretreated MBC.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Docetaxel and capecitabine, a tumor-activated oral fluoropyrimidine, show high single-agent efficacy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and synergy in preclinical studies. This international phase III trial compared efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine/docetaxel therapy with single-agent docetaxel in anthracycline-pretreated patients with MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to 21-day cycles of oral capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1 to 14 plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 (n = 255) or to docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 (n = 256). RESULTS:Capecitabine/docetaxel resulted in significantly superior efficacy in time to disease progression (TTP) (hazard ratio, 0.652; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.545 to 0.780; P =.0001; median, 6.1 v 4.2 months), overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.775; 95% CI, 0.634 to 0.947; P =.0126; median, 14.5 v 11.5 months), and objective tumor response rate (42% v 30%, P =.006) compared with docetaxel. Gastrointestinal side effects and hand-foot syndrome were more common with combination therapy, whereas myalgia, arthralgia, and neutropenic fever/sepsis were more common with single-agent docetaxel. More grade 3 adverse events occurred with combination therapy (71% v 49%, respectively), whereas grade 4 events were slightly more common with docetaxel (31% v 25% with combination). CONCLUSION: The significantly superior TTP and survival achieved with the addition of capecitabine to docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), with the manageable toxicity profile, indicate that this combination provides clear benefits over single-agent docetaxel 100 mg/m(2). Docetaxel/capecitabine therapy is an important treatment option for women with anthracycline-pretreated MBC.
Authors: Harry D Bear; Gong Tang; Priya Rastogi; Charles E Geyer; André Robidoux; James N Atkins; Luis Baez-Diaz; Adam M Brufsky; Rita S Mehta; Louis Fehrenbacher; James A Young; Francis M Senecal; Rakesh Gaur; Richard G Margolese; Paul T Adams; Howard M Gross; Joseph P Costantino; Sandra M Swain; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Norman Wolmark Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Stacy Moulder; Gregory Gladish; Joe Ensor; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Massimo Cristofanilli; James L Murray; Daniel Booser; Sharon H Giordano; Abeena Brewster; Julia Moore; Edgardo Rivera; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Hai T Tran Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Helen K Chew; William E Barlow; Kathy Albain; Danika Lew; Allen Gown; Daniel F Hayes; Julie Gralow; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Robert Livingston Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Michelle A Rudek; Roisin M Connolly; Janelle M Hoskins; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Stacie C Jeter; Deborah K Armstrong; John H Fetting; Vered Stearns; Laurie A Wright; Ming Zhao; Stanley P Watkins; Howard L McLeod; Nancy E Davidson; Antonio C Wolff Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Min Kyoung Kim; Sung-Bae Kim; Jin Hee Ahn; Soon Im Lee; Sei-Hyun Ahn; Byung Ho Son; Gyungyub Gong; Hak-Hee Kim; Jung-Shin Lee; Yoon-Koo Kang; Woo Kun Kim Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2006-12-31 Impact factor: 4.679
Authors: E A Perez; D W Hillman; T Dentchev; N A Le-Lindqwister; L H Geeraerts; T R Fitch; H Liu; D L Graham; S P Kahanic; H M Gross; T A Patel; F M Palmieri; A C Dueck Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-11-09 Impact factor: 32.976