OBJECTIVES: To identify factors limiting the effectiveness of communication between Aboriginal patients with end-stage renal disease and healthcare workers, and to identify strategies for improving communication. DESIGN: Qualitative study, gathering data through (a) videotaped interactions between patients and staff, and (b) in-depth interviews with all participants, in their first language, about their perceptions of the interaction, their interpretation of the video record and their broader experience with intercultural communication. SETTING: A satellite dialysis unit in suburban Darwin, Northern Territory. The interactions occurred between March and July 2001. PARTICIPANTS: Aboriginal patients from the Yolngu language group of north-east Arnhem Land and their medical, nursing and allied professional carers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors influencing the quality of communication. RESULTS: A shared understanding of key concepts was rarely achieved. Miscommunication often went unrecognised. Sources of miscommunication included lack of patient control over the language, timing, content and circumstances of interactions; differing modes of discourse; dominance of biomedical knowledge and marginalisation of Yolngu knowledge; absence of opportunities and resources to construct a body of shared understanding; cultural and linguistic distance; lack of staff training in intercultural communication; and lack of involvement of trained interpreters. CONCLUSIONS: Miscommunication is pervasive. Trained interpreters provide only a partial solution. Fundamental change is required for Aboriginal patients to have significant input into the management of their illness. Educational resources are needed to facilitate a shared understanding, not only of renal physiology, disease and treatment, but also of the cultural, social and economic dimensions of the illness experience of Aboriginal people.
OBJECTIVES: To identify factors limiting the effectiveness of communication between Aboriginal patients with end-stage renal disease and healthcare workers, and to identify strategies for improving communication. DESIGN: Qualitative study, gathering data through (a) videotaped interactions between patients and staff, and (b) in-depth interviews with all participants, in their first language, about their perceptions of the interaction, their interpretation of the video record and their broader experience with intercultural communication. SETTING: A satellite dialysis unit in suburban Darwin, Northern Territory. The interactions occurred between March and July 2001. PARTICIPANTS: Aboriginal patients from the Yolngu language group of north-east Arnhem Land and their medical, nursing and allied professional carers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors influencing the quality of communication. RESULTS: A shared understanding of key concepts was rarely achieved. Miscommunication often went unrecognised. Sources of miscommunication included lack of patient control over the language, timing, content and circumstances of interactions; differing modes of discourse; dominance of biomedical knowledge and marginalisation of Yolngu knowledge; absence of opportunities and resources to construct a body of shared understanding; cultural and linguistic distance; lack of staff training in intercultural communication; and lack of involvement of trained interpreters. CONCLUSIONS: Miscommunication is pervasive. Trained interpreters provide only a partial solution. Fundamental change is required for Aboriginal patients to have significant input into the management of their illness. Educational resources are needed to facilitate a shared understanding, not only of renal physiology, disease and treatment, but also of the cultural, social and economic dimensions of the illness experience of Aboriginal people.
Authors: Emily F M Fitzpatrick; Alexandra L C Martiniuk; Heather D'Antoine; June Oscar; Maureen Carter; Elizabeth J Elliott Journal: BMC Med Ethics Date: 2016-10-22 Impact factor: 2.652
Authors: J A Meiklejohn; G Garvey; R Bailie; E Walpole; J Adams; D Williamson; J Martin; C M Bernardes; B Arley; B Marcusson; P C Valery Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Baiju R Shah; Morgan Slater; Eliot Frymire; Kristen Jacklin; Roseanne Sutherland; Shahriar Khan; Jennifer D Walker; Michael E Green Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2020-05-05
Authors: Laura A McClure; Sally L Glaser; Sarah J Shema; Laura Allen; Charles Quesenberry; Esther M John; Scarlett L Gomez Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2010-08