Literature DB >> 12064128

Congenital clubfoot.

R Jay Cummings1, Richard S Davidson, Peter F Armstrong, Wallace B Lehman.   

Abstract

Although the etiology of congenital clubfoot remains unknown, reproducible pretreatment grading now seems possible. However, the lack of an agreed-on and reproducible posttreatment evaluation system still hinders outcome studies of the treatment of clubfoot. The literature from about 1970 to 1990 contains enthusiastic reports on the correction of congenital clubfoot through extensive surgical release procedures. Over time, we have come to recognize the complications of such surgery, including recurrence, overcorrection, stiffness, and pain (WJ Shaughnessy, MD, P Dechet, MD, HB Kitaoka, MD, Vancouver, BC, Canada, unpublished data, 2000). Perhaps because of these findings, there is a renewed interest in nonsurgical techniques for the correction of congenital clubfoot. Recent studies have documented the effectiveness of the two leading techniques involving serial manipulation and cast treatment. The Ponseti technique appears to be effective and requires only a reasonable amount of time out of the lives of the patient and his or her parents. The technique frequently includes some minimally invasive surgery. The Kite and Lovell technique requires minimally invasive surgery less often but is more time consuming. French investigators and others have introduced new ideas that may reduce the need to immobilize the foot. The French approach requires fairly extensive physical therapy and demands substantial parental time and attention. It is not yet clear that the French technique is more successful in obviating the need for surgery than is expertly applied serial manipulation and cast immobilization. It also has not been proved that the long-term results of the French technique are better than those of serial manipulation and cast immobilization. It is probably that unless the French technique is found to substantially decrease the need for surgery, it will prove to be less cost effective than serial manipulation and cast immobilization. It is likely that a small number of clubfeet will require surgery even after expertly applied nonsurgical treatment. However, it is hoped that such surgery will be less extensive than procedures commonly performed in the recent past.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12064128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Instr Course Lect        ISSN: 0065-6895


  5 in total

1.  The role of radiographic measurements in the evaluation of congenital clubfoot surgical results.

Authors:  Marcos William Fridman; Henrique Sodré de Almeida Fialho
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Taylor spatial frame in severe foot deformities using double osteotomy: technical approach and primary results.

Authors:  Hazibullah Waizy; Henning Windhagen; Christina Stukenborg-Colsman; Thilo Floerkemeier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Early results of treatment for congenital clubfoot using the Ponseti method.

Authors:  Lukasz Matuszewski; Leszek Gil; Jacek Karski
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2011-09-10

4.  A rare case of 3C disease: Ritscher-Schinzel syndrome presenting with recurrent talipes equinovarus.

Authors:  Mehmet Nuri Konya; Muhsin Elmas; Sadık Emre Erginoğlu; Murat Yeşil
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-11-06

5.  Clubfoot: etiology and treatment.

Authors:  Ashish Anand; Debra A Sala
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.251

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.