BACKGROUND/AIMS: Laparoscopic splenectomy is now increasingly being performed. However, controversy remains regarding the effectiveness of a laparoscopic splenectomy for patients with portal hypertension. METHODOLOGY: Seventy-three patients with portal hypertension who underwent a laparoscopic splenectomy from February 1992 until October 2000 were reviewed and the effectiveness of the procedures for portal hypertension was evaluated. Forty-two patients had esophagogastric varices and twenty had a concomitant hepatocellular carcinoma. The indications for surgery were bleeding tendency due to thrombocytopenia (n = 40), difficulty in receiving treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma due to thrombocytopenia (n = 18), and sclerotherapy-resistant esophagogastric varices (n = 15). RESULTS: A laparoscopic splenectomy was successfully performed in all the patients. The rate of conversion to conventional open surgery was 9.6% (7/73). The mean operative time was 210.1 +/- 101.9 minutes, and the estimated blood loss was 374.7 +/- 352.4 mL. There were no cases of mortality, and morbidity was encountered in 11.0% of patients. The increase in the platelet count correlated significantly to the spleen weight (P < 0.001). The platelet count had been maintained at over 10 x 10(4)/mm3 for over three years. Eighteen patients with hepatocellular carcinoma successfully underwent treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma after surgery and no recurrence of esophagogastric varices was encountered. CONCLUSIONS: A laparoscopic splenectomy resulted in the successful secondary treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and esophagogastric varices. Portal hypertension was not a contraindication. A laparoscopic approach is therefore the procedure of choice for a splenectomy in portal hypertension.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Laparoscopic splenectomy is now increasingly being performed. However, controversy remains regarding the effectiveness of a laparoscopic splenectomy for patients with portal hypertension. METHODOLOGY: Seventy-three patients with portal hypertension who underwent a laparoscopic splenectomy from February 1992 until October 2000 were reviewed and the effectiveness of the procedures for portal hypertension was evaluated. Forty-two patients had esophagogastric varices and twenty had a concomitant hepatocellular carcinoma. The indications for surgery were bleeding tendency due to thrombocytopenia (n = 40), difficulty in receiving treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma due to thrombocytopenia (n = 18), and sclerotherapy-resistant esophagogastric varices (n = 15). RESULTS: A laparoscopic splenectomy was successfully performed in all the patients. The rate of conversion to conventional open surgery was 9.6% (7/73). The mean operative time was 210.1 +/- 101.9 minutes, and the estimated blood loss was 374.7 +/- 352.4 mL. There were no cases of mortality, and morbidity was encountered in 11.0% of patients. The increase in the platelet count correlated significantly to the spleen weight (P < 0.001). The platelet count had been maintained at over 10 x 10(4)/mm3 for over three years. Eighteen patients with hepatocellular carcinoma successfully underwent treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma after surgery and no recurrence of esophagogastric varices was encountered. CONCLUSIONS: A laparoscopic splenectomy resulted in the successful secondary treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and esophagogastric varices. Portal hypertension was not a contraindication. A laparoscopic approach is therefore the procedure of choice for a splenectomy in portal hypertension.
Authors: Maria Baimas-George; Michael Watson; Patrick Salibi; Keith J Murphy; Dionisios Vrochides; John B Martinie; Erin H Baker; David A Iannitti Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: B Habermalz; S Sauerland; G Decker; B Delaitre; J-F Gigot; E Leandros; K Lechner; M Rhodes; G Silecchia; A Szold; E Targarona; P Torelli; E Neugebauer Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2008-02-22 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Kent W Kercher; Alfredo M Carbonell; B Todd Heniford; Brent D Matthews; Dawn M Cunningham; Robert W Reindollar Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 3.452