Literature DB >> 12063675

Issues in clinical trial design for tumor marker studies.

Daniel Sargent1, Carmen Allegra.   

Abstract

Scientific inquiry into the discovery, development, and application of tumor markers is proceeding rapidly. Despite this explosion in research and interest, the design of studies to formally assess the value of tumor markers in clinical practice is inconsistent and immature. Indeed, few markers have been widely accepted into standard clinical practice. Many issues must be prospectively considered in a methodical, systematic, and scientific fashion if progress is to be made in the development of validated tests that will have value in the management of patients with cancer. The purpose of this report is to present a discussion of the issues involved in designing clinical studies of putative tumor markers which provide sufficient data to result in the incorporation of the marker into clinical practice. We will focus on the design of studies to demonstrate and validate the clinical utility of both prognostic and predictive markers. Topics to be covered include issues of patient and sample heterogeneity, the prevalence of the marker, the sample capture rate, and the choice of endpoints. This will be followed by explicit consideration of study design, specifically the trial randomization schema for both prognostic and predictive factor studies. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12063675     DOI: 10.1053/sonc.2002.32898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol        ISSN: 0093-7754            Impact factor:   4.929


  19 in total

1.  Adaptive clinical trial designs in oncology.

Authors:  Yong Zang; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12

2.  Relative efficiency of precision medicine designs for clinical trials with predictive biomarkers.

Authors:  Weichung Joe Shih; Yong Lin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The Fundamental Difficulty With Evaluating the Accuracy of Biomarkers for Guiding Treatment.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Margaret S Pepe; Lisa M McShane; Daniel J Sargent; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Precision oncology: A new era of cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Lindsay A Renfro; Ming-Wen An; Sumithra J Mandrekar
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 8.679

5.  Adjusting for covariates in evaluating markers for selecting treatment, with application to guiding chemotherapy for treating estrogen-receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Marshall D Brown; Michael R Crager; Dave P Miller; William E Barlow
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Optimal marker-strategy clinical trial design to detect predictive markers for targeted therapy.

Authors:  Yong Zang; Suyu Liu; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  Clinical trial designs for predictive biomarker validation: one size does not fit all.

Authors:  Sumithra J Mandrekar; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.051

8.  Randomized phase III clinical trial designs for targeted agents.

Authors:  Antje Hoering; Mike Leblanc; John J Crowley
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  Incorporation of prognostic and predictive factors into glioma clinical trials.

Authors:  Derek R Johnson; Evanthia Galanis
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  A perspective on challenges and issues in biomarker development and drug and biomarker codevelopment.

Authors:  Sheila E Taube; Gary M Clark; Janet E Dancey; Lisa M McShane; Caroline C Sigman; Steven I Gutman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.