Literature DB >> 12063654

Outcomes instruments in facial plastic surgery.

Ramsey Alsarraf1.   

Abstract

The accurate measurement of patient-related outcomes of facial plastic surgery procedures relies upon the development, standardization, and use of validated, procedure-specific quality of life instruments. Although other fields of medicine and surgery have embraced the use of such instruments for the quantification and measurement of otherwise subjective or qualitative aspects of patient satisfaction, in the fields of both general and facial plastic surgery, little has been done in this realm. The study of outcomes research and the application of outcomes research to facial plastic surgery have already been discussed in this issue. Outcomes research is founded upon the ability to measure in some fashion those aspects of patient satisfaction that have hitherto been ignored or at best poorly quantified in the assessment of the results of a medical or surgical intervention. In facial plastic surgery, particularly cosmetic facial plastic surgery, the overwhelming majority of results are subjective in nature, be they patient related or based upon the surgeon's own personal assessment of outcome. For this reason, the use of validated instruments to quantify and measure these results is of particular importance in facial plastic surgery compared with other fields of medicine where many outcomes are objectively determined, such as mortality. This article outlines the background of the use of quality of life instruments in the field of outcomes research to provide a basic understanding for the application of such tools to the work of facial plastic surgery. Specific instruments that have already been developed and validated are described as well. Finally, future directions are highlighted that may allow the improved measurement of patient satisfaction as the field of outcomes research in facial plastic surgery continues to evolve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12063654     DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-32197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 0736-6825            Impact factor:   1.446


  6 in total

1.  Ultrasound imaging of the nose in septorhinoplasty patients.

Authors:  Markus Stenner; Claudia Rudack
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Aesthetic and Functional Evaluation of Total Nasal Reconstructions.

Authors:  Luigi Angelo Vaira; Olindo Massarelli; Giovanna Deiana; Silvio Mario Meloni; Giovanni Dell'aversana Orabona; Pasquale Piombino; Giacomo De Riu
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-01-12

3.  Quality of life of individuals with and without facial feminization surgery or gender reassignment surgery.

Authors:  Tiffiny A Ainsworth; Jeffrey H Spiegel
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Measuring the nose in septorhinoplasty patients: ultrasonographic standard values and clinical correlations.

Authors:  Markus Stenner; Mario Koopmann; Claudia Rudack
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  How to use outcomes questionnaires: pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Sunitha Malay; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 2.017

6.  Quality of life before and after septoplasty and rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Ingo Baumann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-04-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.