M Morino1, M Toppino, G Bonnet, R Rosa, C Garrone. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti, 14, 10126 Turin, Italy. mmorino@ddmc.unito.it
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The advantages of treating morbidly obese patients via the laparoscopic approach have been demonstrated, in particular, for adjustable silicone gastric banding, but this operation is associated with a high rate of late complications. Gastric bypass and malabsorbitive procedures are feasible via the laparoscopic approach, but they entail a prolonged operating time and a consistently high morbidity rate. Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty represents an effective alternative. METHODS: We performed 250 consecutive LVBG between November 1995 and February 2000. The procedure consisted of a personal technique designed to reproduce, by laparoscopy, MacLean's modification of the standard open Mason vertical-banded gastroplasty, with a calibrated transgastric window, a complete division between the staple lines, and a 5-cm-circumference polypropylene collar. RESULTS: The operative time was 95 min and the conversion rate was 0.8%. Operative mortality was nil; early and late complications, respectively, were 4.4% and 4%; the reoperation rate was 2%. Global results at 4 years were as follows: excess weight loss (EWL) 61%, success rate (excess weight <50%) 76.9%, body mass index (BMI) 29.4 kg/m2. In morbidly obese patients, the EWL at 4 years was 62.2%, with a 77.4% success rate and a 28.4 kg/m2 BMI; in superobese patients, the EWL at 4 years was 54.9% with a 50% success rate and a 35.5 kg/m2 BMI. The overall follow-up rate was 92%. CONCLUSIONS: LVBG is an effective and safe operation in morbidly obese patients, providing good weight loss with a low morbidity rate, no mortality, and minimum discomfort. However, in superobese patients, the weight loss results are disappointing; in these patients, LVBG is questionable and more complex procedures should be considered.
BACKGROUND: The advantages of treating morbidly obesepatients via the laparoscopic approach have been demonstrated, in particular, for adjustable silicone gastric banding, but this operation is associated with a high rate of late complications. Gastric bypass and malabsorbitive procedures are feasible via the laparoscopic approach, but they entail a prolonged operating time and a consistently high morbidity rate. Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty represents an effective alternative. METHODS: We performed 250 consecutive LVBG between November 1995 and February 2000. The procedure consisted of a personal technique designed to reproduce, by laparoscopy, MacLean's modification of the standard open Mason vertical-banded gastroplasty, with a calibrated transgastric window, a complete division between the staple lines, and a 5-cm-circumference polypropylene collar. RESULTS: The operative time was 95 min and the conversion rate was 0.8%. Operative mortality was nil; early and late complications, respectively, were 4.4% and 4%; the reoperation rate was 2%. Global results at 4 years were as follows: excess weight loss (EWL) 61%, success rate (excess weight <50%) 76.9%, body mass index (BMI) 29.4 kg/m2. In morbidly obesepatients, the EWL at 4 years was 62.2%, with a 77.4% success rate and a 28.4 kg/m2 BMI; in superobese patients, the EWL at 4 years was 54.9% with a 50% success rate and a 35.5 kg/m2 BMI. The overall follow-up rate was 92%. CONCLUSIONS: LVBG is an effective and safe operation in morbidly obesepatients, providing good weight loss with a low morbidity rate, no mortality, and minimum discomfort. However, in superobese patients, the weight loss results are disappointing; in these patients, LVBG is questionable and more complex procedures should be considered.
Authors: S Sauerland; L Angrisani; M Belachew; J M Chevallier; F Favretti; N Finer; A Fingerhut; M Garcia Caballero; J A Guisado Macias; R Mittermair; M Morino; S Msika; F Rubino; R Tacchino; R Weiner; E A M Neugebauer Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2004-12-02 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: D Nocca; R Aggarwal; P Blanc; B Gallix; G L Di Mauro; B Millat; C Seguin des De Hons; E Deneve; J G Rodier; G Tincani; M A Pierredon; J M Fabre Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2006-11-14 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Paolo Leombruni; Andrea Pierò; Davide Dosio; Alessia Novelli; Giovanni Abbate-Daga; Mario Morino; Mauro Toppino; Secondo Fassino Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Martin R van Wezenbeek; Frans J F Smulders; Jean-Paul J G M de Zoete; Misha D Luyer; Gust van Montfort; Simon W Nienhuijs Journal: World J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-03-27