Literature DB >> 12062945

Non-destructive dental-age calculation methods in adults: intra- and inter-observer effects.

Guy Willems1, Christian Moulin-Romsee, Tore Solheim.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to obtain data on the reliability and reproducibility of two non-destructive dental-age estimation methods in adults by calculating inter- and intra-observer effects. Both a morphological and a radiological technique available in the scientific literature were evaluated on a number of recently extracted teeth: the morphological technique was evaluated on a total of 160 teeth by two examiners, while three examiners applied the radiological technique on apical radiographs of 72 extracted teeth. Paired t-tests were used to calculate intra- and inter-observer differences. For the morphological method, both examiners were able to produce dental-age estimations that did not differ significantly from the real age of the teeth, obtaining a mean error between 0.5 and 1.8 years and a standard deviation of this error between 9.0 and 11.3 years. When using the radiological technique according to the original protocol, all three examiners produced age estimations that were statistically comparable to the real age of the teeth with a mean error of 0.5-2.5 years and a standard deviation of 4.6-9.8 years. For both techniques, intra-observer differences were observed. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that both non-destructive dental-age estimation techniques were able to produce reasonably accurate dental-age estimations, at least when these techniques were applied appropriately. However, the forensic odontologist is recommended to use different age estimation techniques and perform repetitive measurements in order to verify the reproducibility of the calculations performed. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12062945     DOI: 10.1016/s0379-0738(02)00081-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  18 in total

1.  Reliability of India-specific regression formula for age estimation of population in and around Bahadurgarh, Haryana (India).

Authors:  Ankita Tandon; Vartika Agarwal; Varun Arora
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-07-29

2.  Influence of the examiner's qualification and sources of error during stage determination of the medial clavicular epiphysis by means of computed tomography.

Authors:  Daniel Wittschieber; Ronald Schulz; Volker Vieth; Martin Küppers; Thomas Bajanowski; Frank Ramsthaler; Klaus Püschel; Heidi Pfeiffer; Sven Schmidt; Andreas Schmeling
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Reliability of Schmeling's stages of ossification of medial clavicular epiphyses and its validity to assess 18 years of age in living subjects.

Authors:  R Cameriere; S De Luca; D De Angelis; V Merelli; A Giuliodori; M Cingolani; C Cattaneo; L Ferrante
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Validity and reliability of dental age estimation of teeth root translucency based on digital luminance determination.

Authors:  Frank Ramsthaler; Mattias Kettner; Marcel A Verhoff
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Applicability of Cameriere's and Drusini's age estimation methods to a sample of Turkish adults.

Authors:  Boyacioglu Dogru Hatice; Avcu Nihal; Akkaya Nursel; Yilanci Humeyra Ozge; Dincer Goksuluk
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  With or without human interference for precise age estimation based on machine learning?

Authors:  Mengqi Han; Shaoyi Du; Yuyan Ge; Dong Zhang; Yuting Chi; Hong Long; Jing Yang; Yang Yang; Jingmin Xin; Teng Chen; Nanning Zheng; Yu-Cheng Guo
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Radiographic analysis of epiphyseal fusion at knee joint to assess likelihood of having attained 18 years of age.

Authors:  R Cameriere; M Cingolani; A Giuliodori; S De Luca; L Ferrante
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  Age estimation using maxillary central incisors: A radiographic study.

Authors:  Nitin Agarwal; Parul Ahuja; Abhishek Sinha; Anil Singh
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2012-07

9.  Radiographic evaluation of dental age of adults using Kvaal's method.

Authors:  Ridhima Sharma; Anurag Srivastava
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2010-01

10.  Reliability of age estimation using Demirjian's 8 teeth method and India specific formula.

Authors:  V Jayanth Kumar; K Saraswathi Gopal
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2011-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.