Literature DB >> 12062893

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine modulates motor behavior through practice. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-dose study in healthy subjects.

Isabelle Loubinoux1, Jérémie Pariente, Olivier Rascol, Pierre Celsis, François Chollet.   

Abstract

We hypothesized that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) could modulate motor activity in healthy subjects in a dose-dependent manner. The effects of a single dose of paroxetine were tested in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Six randomized and counterbalanced subjects performed behavioral tests in three sessions 1 week apart (E1, E2 and E3) at peak plasma concentration (5 h after drug intake). Each subject was given 20 mg or 60 mg of the drug, or a placebo. Tasks were the Nine Peg Hole test (three trials), Moede dexteritymeter (two trials), and compatible and incompatible reaction time tasks. The results show that at the first trials, performance did not differ after placebo or paroxetine intake. However, 20 and 60 mg of paroxetine improved performance significantly at the third trial of the Nine Peg Hole test and subjects receiving the drug performed 7% faster than those under placebo. An amount of 20 mg, but not 60 mg, of paroxetine improved dexterity significantly at the second trial of the Moede test and subjects performed 30% faster. Conversely, the drug did not affect reaction time for the compatible task and subjects were 11% slower under 20 mg with the incompatible task. Thus, paroxetine decreased the ability to inhibit automatism. Thus, it was concluded that a single dose of paroxetine improved motor performance through practice. But negative effects occurred on tasks including the inhibition of an automatism. Paroxetine enhanced brain motor output (motor activity in S1M1) [NeuroImage, 15 (2002) 26]. This S1M1 hyperactivation is likely to be responsible for the better performance. The brain effect and motor improvement were dose dependent. For both, 20 mg was the optimal dose. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12062893     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00030-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  15 in total

1.  Neuroadaptive responses to citalopram in rats using pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sakthivel Sekar; M Verhoye; J Van Audekerke; G Vanhoutte; Andrew S Lowe; Andrew M Blamire; Thomas Steckler; A Van der Linden; Mohammed Shoaib
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  No effects of enhanced central norepinephrine on finger-sequence learning and attention.

Authors:  Christian Plewnia; Julia Hoppe; Christian Gerloff
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-06-10       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Neurochemical changes underpinning the development of adjunct therapies in recovery after stroke: A role for GABA?

Authors:  Ainslie Johnstone; Jacob M Levenstein; Emily L Hinson; Charlotte J Stagg
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 4.  Central fatigue: the serotonin hypothesis and beyond.

Authors:  Romain Meeusen; Philip Watson; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Bart Roelands; Maria F Piacentini
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Paroxetine-induced modulation of cortical activity supporting language representations of action.

Authors:  Patrice Péran; Jean-François Démonet; Dominique Cardebat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Whole body heat stress increases motor cortical excitability and skill acquisition in humans.

Authors:  Andrew E Littmann; Richard K Shields
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Effect of serotonin on paired associative stimulation-induced plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Giorgi Batsikadze; Walter Paulus; Min-Fang Kuo; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Fluoxetine Does Not Enhance Visual Perceptual Learning and Triazolam Specifically Impairs Learning Transfer.

Authors:  Alice K Lagas; Joanna M Black; Winston D Byblow; Melanie K Fleming; Lucy K Goodman; Robert R Kydd; Bruce R Russell; Cathy M Stinear; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Modulation of premotor cortex response to sequence motor learning during escitalopram intake.

Authors:  Eóin N Molloy; Karsten Mueller; Nathalie Beinhölzl; Maria Blöchl; Fabian A Piecha; André Pampel; Christopher J Steele; Ulrike Scharrer; Gergana Zheleva; Ralf Regenthal; Bernhard Sehm; Vadim V Nikulin; Harald E Möller; Arno Villringer; Julia Sacher
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 6.200

10.  Time related effects on functional brain connectivity after serotonergic and cholinergic neuromodulation.

Authors:  Bernadet L Klaassens; Serge A R B Rombouts; Anderson M Winkler; Helene C van Gorsel; Jeroen van der Grond; Joop M A van Gerven
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.