Literature DB >> 12062772

Comparison between local field potentials and unit cluster activity in primary auditory cortex and anterior auditory field in the cat.

Arnaud Noreña1, Jos J Eggermont.   

Abstract

Multi-unit (MU) activity and local field potentials (LFP) were simultaneously recorded from 161 sites in the middle cortical layers of the primary auditory cortex (AI) and the anterior auditory field (AAF) in 51 cats. Responses were obtained for frequencies between 625 Hz and 40 kHz, at intensities from 75 dB SPL to threshold. We compared the response properties of MU activity and LFP triggers, in terms of characteristic frequency (CF), threshold at CF, minimum latency and frequency tuning-curve bandwidth 20 dB above threshold. On average, thresholds at CF were significantly lower for LFP events than those for MU spikes (4.6 dB for AI, and 3 dB for AAF). Minimum latencies were significantly shorter for LFP events than for MU spikes (1.5 ms in AI, and 1.7 ms in AAF). Frequency tuning curves were significantly broader for LFP events than those for MU spikes (1.0 octave in AI, and 1.3 octaves in AAF). In contrast, the CF was not significantly different between LFP events and MU spikes. The LFP results indicate that cortical neurons receive convergent sub-cortical inputs from a broad frequency range. The sharper tuning curves for MU activity compared to those of LFP events are likely the result of intracortical inhibitory processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12062772     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00329-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  23 in total

Review 1.  Packet-based communication in the cortex.

Authors:  Artur Luczak; Bruce L McNaughton; Kenneth D Harris
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Membrane potential dynamics of populations of cortical neurons during auditory streaming.

Authors:  Brandon J Farley; Arnaud J Noreña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Laminar diversity of dynamic sound processing in cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Temporal stability of visually selective responses in intracranial field potentials recorded from human occipital and temporal lobes.

Authors:  Arjun K Bansal; Jedediah M Singer; William S Anderson; Alexandra Golby; Joseph R Madsen; Gabriel Kreiman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Intravascular Neural Interface with Nanowire Electrode.

Authors:  Hirobumi Watanabe; Hirokazu Takahashi; Masayuki Nakao; Kerry Walton; Rodolfo R Llinás
Journal:  Electron Commun Jpn       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.324

6.  Predicting stimulus-locked single unit spiking from cortical local field potentials.

Authors:  Edgar E Galindo-Leon; Robert C Liu
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  How local is the local field potential?

Authors:  Yoshinao Kajikawa; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Increasing spectrotemporal sound density reveals an octave-based organization in cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Arnaud J Noreña; Boris Gourévitch; Martin Pienkowski; Greg Shaw; Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Tone-detection training enhances spectral integration mediated by intracortical pathways in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Fei Guo; Irakli Intskirveli; David T Blake; Raju Metherate
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Second spatial derivative analysis of cortical surface potentials recorded in cat primary auditory cortex using thin film surface arrays: Comparisons with multi-unit data.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Sam Irving; Satinderpall S Pannu; Angela C Tooker; Andrew K Wise; Robert K Shepherd; Dexter R F Irvine
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.