Literature DB >> 12062601

Risk group stratification in patients undergoing permanent (125)I prostate brachytherapy as monotherapy.

Young Kwok1, Steven J DiBiase, Pradip P Amin, Michael Naslund, Geoffrey Sklar, Stephen C Jacobs.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy (PB) as monotherapy are often selected on the basis of favorable pretreatment factors. However, intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients are commonly offered PB as monotherapy without the addition of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or hormonal therapy. This series reports the outcome of patients undergoing PB as monotherapy who were stratified into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups with extended follow-up. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 102 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent PB alone as monotherapy. EBRT or hormonal therapy was not part of their initial treatment. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse-free survival (PRFS) was determined in accordance with the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus statement. Patients were stratified as at favorable risk (Stage T1-2a, pretreatment PSA < or =10.0 ng/mL, and Gleason score < or =6), intermediate risk (one prognostic indicator with a higher value), or unfavorable risk (> or =2 indicators with higher values). The median follow-up period for patients in this series was 7 years (range 2.1-9.7). The median age at treatment was 71 years (range 54-80), and the median prescribed dose of (125)I was 145 Gy.
RESULTS: Forty patients experienced a biochemical relapse at a median of 1.9 years (range 0.4-4.2). The 5-year actuarial PRFS rate for patients with favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable risk was 85%, 63%, and 24%, respectively (p <0.0001). All but 1 patient had the relapse within the first 5 years of treatment. When stratifying patients on the basis of their pretreatment PSA level, the 5-year PRFS rate for men with a PSA < or =10 ng/mL vs. >10 ng/mL was 78% vs. 35%, respectively (p = 0.0005). Furthermore, the 5-year PRFS rate for men with a Gleason score of < or =6 vs. > or =7 was 74% vs. 33%, respectively (p = 0.0001). No difference was found between Stage T1-T2a and Stage T2b or higher (64% vs. 54%, respectively; p = 0.353).
CONCLUSION: On the basis of risk stratification, PB as monotherapy produces comparable PRFS to EBRT and surgery at 7 years of follow-up. PB as monotherapy is particularly ineffective in patients with unfavorable risk factors, and additional therapy is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12062601     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02796-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  7 in total

1.  Serial changes of international prostate symptom score following I-125 prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Toshio Ohashi; Atsunori Yorozu; Kazuhito Toya; Shiro Saito; Tetsuo Momma
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Biochemical control of prostate cancer with iodine-125 brachytherapy alone: experience from a single institution.

Authors:  Larissa Pereira da Ponte Amadei; João Luis Fernandes Silva; Samir Abdallah Hanna; Cecília Maria Kalil Haddad; Adriano João Nesrallah; Heloisa Andrade Carvalho
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for predicting pathologic T3 disease in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: implications for prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Thomas J Pugh; Steven J Frank; Mary Achim; Deborah A Kuban; Andrew K Lee; Karen E Hoffman; Sean E McGuire; David A Swanson; Rajat Kudchadker; John W Davis
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Georgios Koukourakis; Nikolaos Kelekis; Vassilios Armonis; Vassilios Kouloulias
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2009-09-01

Review 5.  Current status and perspectives of brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yasuo Yoshioka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Current status of brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Dong Soo Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-11-14

Review 7.  Brachytherapy: update and results.

Authors:  Rodney J Ellis; Edward Kim
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.862

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.