Literature DB >> 12061635

Effect of in ovo vaccine delivery route on herpesvirus of turkeys/SB-1 efficacy and viremia.

Patricia S Wakenell1, Thomas Bryan, Jon Schaeffer, Alan Avakian, Chris Williams, Craig Whitfill.   

Abstract

A study was designed to ascertain the influence of in ovo site of inoculation and embryonic fluid type on the development of Marek's disease (MD) vaccine viremia and efficacy against MD challenge. The experiments were divided into in vitro and in vivo phases. In the in vitro phase, herpesvirus of turkeys/SB-1 vaccine was combined with basal medium eagle (BME) medium (control), amniotic fluid, or allantoic fluid and subsequently titrated on secondary chick embryo fibroblast cultures. There were no significant differences in titer between the virus inoculum carried in BME and the virus inoculum combined with either the allantoic fluid or the amniotic fluid. In the in vivo phase, five routes of inoculation, amniotic, intraembryonic, allantoic, air cell, and subcutaneous at hatch, were compared for generation of protection against virulent MD challenge. Comparisons were made in both specific-pathogen-free and commercial broiler embryos/chicks and, for the amniotic and allantoic routes, injection at either day 17 or day 18 of embryonation. Reisolation of the vaccine virus at day 3 of age was also done for all routes with the exception of the air cell route. Vaccine virus was recovered from all birds tested that were injected in ovo via the amniotic and intraembryonic routes and the subcutaneously at hatch route but was isolated only sporadically from birds inoculated via the allantoic route. Vaccination protective efficacy against virulent MD for all birds vaccinated in ovo via the amniotic or intraembryonic routes and birds vaccinated subcutaneously at hatch was over 90% regardless of day of in ovo injection or bird type. Protective efficacy for vaccines delivered in ovo by either the allantoic or the air cell routes was less than 50% regardless of day of injection or bird type. Therefore, in ovo MD vaccines must be injected either via the amniotic route or the intraembryonic route for optimal performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12061635     DOI: 10.1637/0005-2086(2002)046[0274:EOIOVD]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  12 in total

1.  Protective avian influenza in ovo vaccination with non-replicating human adenovirus vector.

Authors:  Haroldo Toro; De-chu C Tang; David L Suarez; Matt J Sylte; Jennifer Pfeiffer; Kent R Van Kampen
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Avian influenza vaccination in chickens and pigs with replication-competent adenovirus-free human recombinant adenovirus 5.

Authors:  Haroldo Toro; Frederik W van Ginkel; De-Chu C Tang; Bettina Schemera; Soren Rodning; Joseph Newton
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.577

3.  Effects of the In Ovo Injection of L-Ascorbic Acid on Broiler Hatching Performance.

Authors:  Ayoub Mousstaaid; Seyed A Fatemi; Katie E C Elliott; Abdulmohsen H Alqhtani; Edgar D Peebles
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.231

4.  Protection of chickens against avian influenza with non-replicating adenovirus-vectored vaccine.

Authors:  Haroldo Toro; De-chu C Tang; David L Suarez; Jianfeng Zhang; Zhongkai Shi
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 5.  Applications of In Ovo Technique for the Optimal Development of the Gastrointestinal Tract and the Potential Influence on the Establishment of Its Microbiome in Poultry.

Authors:  Stephanie M Roto; Young Min Kwon; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-08-17

6.  Short-term culture of adult bovine ovarian tissues: chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) vs. traditional in vitro culture systems.

Authors:  Kylie Beck; Jaswant Singh; Mohammad Arshud Dar; Muhammad Anzar
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Evaluation of a thermostable Newcastle disease virus strain TS09-C as an in-ovo vaccine for chickens.

Authors:  Guoyuan Wen; Lintao Li; Qingzhong Yu; Hongling Wang; Qingping Luo; Tengfei Zhang; Rongrong Zhang; Wanpo Zhang; Huabin Shao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Single stranded (ss)RNA-mediated antiviral response against infectious laryngotracheitis virus infection.

Authors:  Mohamed Sarjoon Abdul-Cader; Upasama De Silva Senapathi; Hanaa Ahmed-Hassan; Shayan Sharif; Mohamed Faizal Abdul-Careem
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  Effects of administration of an in ovo coccidiosis vaccine at different embryonic ages on vaccine cycling and performance of broiler chickens,.

Authors:  A O Sokale; C J Williams; F J Hoerr; K E C Collins; E D Peebles
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Effects of stage of broiler embryo development on coccidiosis vaccine injection accuracy, and subsequent oocyst localization and hatchling quality.

Authors:  A O Sokale; C J Williams; M D Triplett; F J Hoerr; E D Peebles
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.